Pair of 5 Sir 2019 MLB

[prolexus]

Anybody else having problems receiving email notifications for this thread?

cheers.

[Tellc1]

Wow!👍

[matt711]

It’s my fault I don’t always follow, but when I do I win, lol.

[spippen]

Nice

[doitnow]

Pairs! Never in doubt!

[Pair of 5s Sir]

Contact SBR, I want my own private suite for the next Bash. Not even sure if they do those Bash trips anymore.

Fellas, I couldn't be happier for you on this run. Play wisely. I am sure that this run will end but definitely one for the ages.

[Husker36]

The man!

[mjsuax13]

Nice job. Certainly helping me out this year. Much appreciated.

[Grivas_Digeni]

72.86

unreal

wtf seriously

[juicername]

Simply amazing. Well done sir. Who was whining? I just saw someone post it was an ugly play backing the Royals and Sparkman. But, as in this case, those usually turn out to be the best plays.

FTR I wasn't whining either, I'll back any team with any pitcher if that's Pairof's play and I realize that part of the contrarian angle is often backing the ugly ones.

Thank you for a fantastic year and more profits to come.

[kcburg]

Anybody else having problems receiving email notifications for this thread?

cheers.

yes they seem to be very delayed for me..end up just checking site

[Pair of 5s Sir]

Selection

Pirates +107 (1 unit)

The Contrarian
120-96 +74.61 units

[Dynasty3669]

Pirates +107 (1 unit)

The Contrarian
120-96 +74.61 units

This has loss written all over it.

[Husker36]

Pirates +107 (1 unit)

The Contrarian
120-96 +74.61 units

Thanks again for sharing. I'm going to get all crazy and put 2 units on the Pirates and 1 unit on Pirates -1.5 (+180). Let's see what happens!

[matt711]

This has loss written all over it.

I don’t get it? He’s up almost 80 units, is this a joke?

[Pair of 5s Sir]

This has loss written all over it.

If you fade the Pirates, I'll root for you. Let me know.

[EasyCover]

I don’t get it? He’s up almost 80 units, is this a joke?

See the winking smiley face above his text.

[Dynasty3669]

I did not take the Phillies Pair. I think Pittsburgh gave up a few weeks ago though.

[Pair of 5s Sir]

I did not take the Phillies Pair. I think Pittsburgh gave up a few weeks ago though.

I need to put that in the equation more as we approach the end here. Nonetheless, we manage to live again.

[Pair of 5s Sir]

Results

Pirates +107 (1 unit) (L)

The Contrarian
120-97 +73.61 units

[KANSAS24]

Pirates +107 (1 unit) (L)

The Contrarian
120-97 +73.61 units

[mikmik]

Fcukijg idiots come out after a loss lmao

[Husker36]

No worries! on to the next game!

[grounds250]

Have not tailed, but definitely followed, awesome what you have done!!

[King tut]

Sir could you let us know if there`s not going to be any plays

[shadymcgrady]

What a season

[Pair of 5s Sir]

Selection

Angels +110 (1 unit)

The Contrarian
120-97 +73.61 units

[KDF500]

Well done. Great stuff.

[kingdom]

Fcukijg idiots come out after a loss lmao

Agreed. i thought the thread was in PT now with all the new faces. guys done a killer job. BOL going forward..

[eddycash]

I will start donating points good sir. I'm starting from zero.

[Pair of 5s Sir]

Results

Angels +110 (1 unit) (L)

Very disappointing Angels bull pen performance in this game, after having a three run lead late.

The Contrarian
120-98 +72.61 units

[Nostradam]

As for sample sizes, all year long threads will have small sample sizes. 1000 games is my threshold for a sample size that deserves merit.

Then, if that is true, your sample size from this season does not deserve merit, correct? Since, if you don't have 1000 posted plays, why should anyone think your plays "deserve merit"? Well, i've only seen 2 years of MLB bets from you, this year & last year, and they don't come anywhere near "1000 games" bet.

As for the rest of my response to this guy’s rant, I’m willing to match my success against anyone.

You mean the "success" that does not reach a "sample size that deserves merit"? BTW, last year your final tally was over 6 units lost.

As for the rest of my response to this guy’s rant, I’m willing to match my success against anyone.

Speaking of documented success, compare your units won this year with 1, 2 and 3 unit plays, with the following record of entirely one unit MLB bets:

2018: 2264-1946-216, +73.36 units
2017: 2076-1792-191, +39.16 units
2016: 1941-1663-194, +41.48 units
2015: 2043-1700-225, +155.08 units
2014: 1904-1565-216, +185.34 units

https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/103339542/weebles-thursday-picks

That poster is up over 400 units, all one unit bets, since 2014. How does your documented online "success" compare with that?

As for sample sizes, all year long threads will have small sample sizes. 1000 games is my threshold for a sample size that deserves merit.

See the "sample sizes" above. Not what i'd call "small" & way over "1000 games" bet for each season.

[Mackballs]

Then, if that is true, your sample size from this season does not deserve merit, correct? Since, if you don't have 1000 posted plays, why should anyone think your plays "deserve merit"? Well, i've only seen 2 years of MLB bets from you, this year & last year, and they don't come anywhere near "1000 games" bet.


You mean the "success" that does not reach a "sample size that deserves merit"? BTW, last year your final tally was over 6 units lost.



Speaking of documented success, compare your units won this year with 1, 2 and 3 unit plays, with the following record of entirely one unit MLB bets:

2018: 2264-1946-216, +73.36 units
2017: 2076-1792-191, +39.16 units
2016: 1941-1663-194, +41.48 units
2015: 2043-1700-225, +155.08 units
2014: 1904-1565-216, +185.34 units

https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/103339542/weebles-thursday-picks

That poster is up over 400 units, all one unit bets, since 2014. How does your documented online "success" compare with that?



See the "sample sizes" above. Not what i'd call "small" & way over "1000 games" bet for each season.

Any chance you live near a high cliff?

[fecgp40]

Any chance you live near a high cliff?

Don't feed the troll.

[kingdom]

Then, if that is true, your sample size from this season does not deserve merit, correct? Since, if you don't have 1000 posted plays, why should anyone think your plays "deserve merit"? Well, i've only seen 2 years of MLB bets from you, this year & last year, and they don't come anywhere near "1000 games" bet.


You mean the "success" that does not reach a "sample size that deserves merit"? BTW, last year your final tally was over 6 units lost.



Speaking of documented success, compare your units won this year with 1, 2 and 3 unit plays, with the following record of entirely one unit MLB bets:

2018: 2264-1946-216, +73.36 units
2017: 2076-1792-191, +39.16 units
2016: 1941-1663-194, +41.48 units
2015: 2043-1700-225, +155.08 units
2014: 1904-1565-216, +185.34 units

https://www.covers.com/forum/ViewThread/103339542/weebles-thursday-picks

That poster is up over 400 units, all one unit bets, since 2014. How does your documented online "success" compare with that?



See the "sample sizes" above. Not what i'd call "small" & way over "1000 games" bet for each season.

so did the guy quit in 2019?