Cortney Casey vs Angela Hill
It's somewhat rare that a fight that's near a pick'em is so easy to call. Every analysis on the fight (Vivisection, Kalikas, HTB, Stumberg, etc.) appears to have a similar read on the fight. That is: 'Cortney Casey is bigger and more athletic with a better ground game. But her wrestling sucks and she will get outpointed in a stand-up battle against a superior technical striker.'
....
Finally, Hill's cardio is one of her weak points whereas Casey has had no problems fighting hard for 3 rounds (with the exception of her very short notice debut against Calderwood). As mentioned earlier, if Casey can grind on Hill early on, Hill's mobiliity and technical advantages will be diminished later in the fight.
Betting wise, Casey decision above +200 was a great line. Another option is to livebet Casey if Hill barely edges out the first round. Hill should have less success working her game in the later rounds.
Casey was +170 or so after the 1st round I think so the livebet option was a good one.
its just laughable lol...one judge had fighter A winning every round.....other judge believe that fighter lost completely LOL...
Yup.. That's why I said fire that judge.. We see that happen at times and I take note of that... Not cool... I saw that fight and Hill won a round at worse...
Johnson must have felt up rounds.....was not aggressive at all in the 3rd.....fili landed mostly blocked stuff.. they prob lean it his way 30-27 29-28's...