OK, I realize this is mostly for show. But there are odds.
I was surprised to see Tyson as more than a slight Underdog. +190 is available.
In reviewing Paul's results, note that most of those fights are against MMA guys. Not pure boxers:
*Ben Askren would even admit that he's not a boxer. It was a $$-grab for Ben.
Boxing is sometimes called "the sweet science." For good reason. There's a lot to learn about attacking + defending.
Key difference = age. Tyson is 30 years older. 57 - 27 = +30.
Tyson is 57, not 77. He should still have plenty in the tank, even if he messed up years ago.
Think about it. If Floyd Mayweather Jr was fighting at age 57, I'd still favor him over 98% of the guys in his weight class. Purely on muscle memory.
I have a hard time thinking that Tyson +190 isn't value. If it's a legit fight, Tyson has to be > 40% to win.
I was surprised to see Tyson as more than a slight Underdog. +190 is available.
In reviewing Paul's results, note that most of those fights are against MMA guys. Not pure boxers:
*Ben Askren would even admit that he's not a boxer. It was a $$-grab for Ben.
Boxing is sometimes called "the sweet science." For good reason. There's a lot to learn about attacking + defending.
Key difference = age. Tyson is 30 years older. 57 - 27 = +30.
Tyson is 57, not 77. He should still have plenty in the tank, even if he messed up years ago.
Think about it. If Floyd Mayweather Jr was fighting at age 57, I'd still favor him over 98% of the guys in his weight class. Purely on muscle memory.
I have a hard time thinking that Tyson +190 isn't value. If it's a legit fight, Tyson has to be > 40% to win.