Sun, Feb 15 Plays

**GoVols817** · 02-15-09, 12:50 PM

Originally posted by curious

Illinois -675 20.25 to win 3
Clemson -365 10.95 to win 3
Butler -2650 79.5 to win 3
Buffalo -200 6 to win 3
South Florida +13 1/2 -110 3.3 to win 3
Akron -695 20.95 to win 3
Drexel -550 17.5 to win 3
Northwestern -180 5.4 to win 3
Illinois Chicago -103 3.09 to win 3
Duke -310 9.3 to win 3
Bowling Green -1050 31.5 to win 3
Illinois State +3 -140 4.2 to win 3
Miami Florida +8 1/2 -110 3.3 to win 3
Arizona State -305 9.15 to win 3
Rider +3 -131 3.93 to win 3

I appreciate you posting these Curious. I always look for your picks.

**BREAKmyBOOKIE** · 02-15-09, 12:52 PM

good to see you back Curious

**curious** · 02-15-09, 12:54 PM

Added Temple -120

Temple -120 3.6 to win 3

**curious** · 02-15-09, 01:38 PM

Deleted Illinois St., Rider, and Illinois Chicago, added 3 plays

Deleted Illinois St., Rider, Illinois Chicago

Added Manhattan, Drake, Valparaiso

**curious** · 02-15-09, 02:01 PM

Clemson 2H -450 to win 6 units

Clemson 2H -450 ~~27 to win 6~~ 54 to win 12 Win

This was supposed to be to win 12 units. This was a hedge against the game play.

**MicGan** · 02-15-09, 02:19 PM

Curious,

Can get your opinion on Akron? I really like this game and like to pwn it. The line is at -11.5 ... I thought -10 is best bet... what do you think?

**curious** · 02-15-09, 02:23 PM

Originally posted by MicGan

Curious,

Can get your opinion on Akron? I really like this game and like to pwn it. The line is at -11.5 ... I thought -10 is best bet... what do you think?

I show the value line for Akron at -2000. Not sure what that is in terms of spread.

I don't play spreads so I don't have opinions on them. If you just have to play the spread then I would buy the line to the best line offered so far today at any book. When I used to play spreads on favs I always did that and it seemed to work well.

**MicGan** · 02-15-09, 02:29 PM

Originally posted by curious

I show the value line for Akron at -2000. Not sure what that is in terms of spread.

I don't play spreads so I don't have opinions on them. If you just have to play the spread then I would buy the line to the best line offered so far today at any book. When I used to play spreads on favs I always did that and it seemed to work well.

Alright man .. thanks. I'll just take the spread and bring it down. It will take much energy for me to bring it back when lose at M/L. Good Luck today.

**curious** · 02-15-09, 02:30 PM

Originally posted by MicGan

Alright man .. thanks. I'll just take the spread and bring it down. It will take much energy for me to bring it back when lose at M/L. Good Luck today.

I would buy it down to 9 1/2.

**curious** · 02-15-09, 02:52 PM

2H Buffalo -185

2H Buffalo -185 11.1 to win 6

**curious** · 02-15-09, 02:57 PM

Butler 2H -600

Butler 2H -600 480 to win 80

**Rick22** · 02-15-09, 03:08 PM

GO Valpo

**facasto** · 02-15-09, 03:47 PM

Ridicolous betting 480 units: are you a Bank?

**50lipa** · 02-15-09, 04:00 PM

Butler might even pull it through for the whole 83 unit play you laid down .

**curious** · 02-15-09, 04:04 PM

Added Akron and Northwestern 2H

See top post in thread.

Northwestern 2H is no play they won the 1 Half

**facasto** · 02-15-09, 04:13 PM

Curious but NOT SERIOUS!!!
Now you can post here that you gained 0.5 (0000000.50000000000000000) units betting on Butler:
Great result. risking 560 gaining 0.1%
Do you know money managing?

**curious** · 02-15-09, 05:22 PM

Originally posted by facasto

Curious but NOT SERIOUS!!!
Now you can post here that you gained 0.5 (0000000.50000000000000000) units betting on Butler:
Great result. risking 560 gaining 0.1%
Do you know money managing?

Yes, I do. Which is why I made the 2H play to hedge the game bet. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. That is why they call it gambling.

**facasto** · 02-15-09, 05:38 PM

It isn't money managing, but such as "martingala", the worst betting system.
And Butler 2H wasn't -600, when I checked it was about -2000

**curious** · 02-15-09, 05:41 PM

Originally posted by facasto

It isn't money managing, but such as "martingala", the worst betting system.
And Butler 2H wasn't -600, when I checked it was about -2000

I'm sure you checked at the book I use. Please go bother someone else. I don't need you to educate me.

**Snevens88** · 02-15-09, 05:42 PM

??

**G's pks** · 02-15-09, 05:44 PM

Guys unlike some curious does not go on others threads and attack... it seems the trouble is always when some attack here... If you do not like his systems no one bends your arm and makes you take his picks. If you do that is up to you. Hey if he had a rough day...that is something he has to deal with... If he wins do you same guys come on here and thank him?

**curious** · 02-15-09, 05:50 PM

Originally posted by G's pks

Guys unlike some curious does not go on others threads and attack... it seems the trouble is always when some attack here... If you do not like his systems no one bends your arm and makes you take his picks. If you do that is up to you. Hey if he had a rough day...that is something he has to deal with... If he wins do you same guys come on here and thank him?

No one ever says anything about my winning plays. They only come here to talk shit about anything that is > -110 that loses because they want to "educate" me. I have had days when I was 10-0, 12-3, 22-2, etc and not a peep out of anyone.

Then this idiot comes in here yelling at me for hedging a game play with a 2H play, calling it "martingale" only he didn't know how to spell martingale.

Let' see, when you get a game line of -2650 and a 2H line of -600 and you play both your effective line is -1125. All year favs who were behind at the half and were laying points for the 2H won the 2H. That is a positive expectation play. So, hedging a losing play at -2650 with a positive expectation play at -600 is just smart. But to this "expert" it is not "money management".

I don't need these morons to teach me how to manage my money. I do just fine without their "expert" advice.

Another thing that I noticed about these idiots is that they all claim that I don't actually play these big money line favs. Yet, if one loses they gloat about that. On the other hand, if a hedge of the loser then wins they claim I didn't actually make that play.

So, it seems that the idiots just want to talk shit. Doesn't matter what I do, they are going to find a reason to talk shit about it.