What do you think?
As a 4 seed, you have a 50/50 chance of playing the 12 seed in the second round thus giving you a higher chance of getting to the sweet 16 than if you are playing against an 8/9 team which are usually hail from power conferences and are battle tested, but just haven't lived up to expectations. For example, Kentucky, Arizona, and Wisconsin.
Basically if you are a #1, you are also giving the 8 or 9 team a week to prepare for you too becuase they know the 16 is not going to beat a one, but the opposite does not exist. If you are a 1, you know it is a coin flip who you are going to play.
Not that a 12 can't beat a 4, but I think there is a less chance of that in the second round than Bucknell beating Memphis or Arizona beating Villanova. Or even UCONN playing a battle tested Kentucky teams that has talent, but just has played poorly in stretches this year. To me, right this moment in only the 2nd round,Boston College has the best draw and they are a 4.
Thoughts?
As a 4 seed, you have a 50/50 chance of playing the 12 seed in the second round thus giving you a higher chance of getting to the sweet 16 than if you are playing against an 8/9 team which are usually hail from power conferences and are battle tested, but just haven't lived up to expectations. For example, Kentucky, Arizona, and Wisconsin.
Basically if you are a #1, you are also giving the 8 or 9 team a week to prepare for you too becuase they know the 16 is not going to beat a one, but the opposite does not exist. If you are a 1, you know it is a coin flip who you are going to play.
Not that a 12 can't beat a 4, but I think there is a less chance of that in the second round than Bucknell beating Memphis or Arizona beating Villanova. Or even UCONN playing a battle tested Kentucky teams that has talent, but just has played poorly in stretches this year. To me, right this moment in only the 2nd round,Boston College has the best draw and they are a 4.
Thoughts?