Lock of the Century #2: ND/UNC UNDER 170.5

**EaglesPhan36** · 11-26-08, 04:58 PM

GL. I thought about it at 167 when I first saw it, but passed. Think it is the right play, but you never know with UNC's depth and Notre Dame's sometimes lazy defense.

**teaserpleaser** · 11-26-08, 05:09 PM

Yep im on the under 152 in the Texas game and i will be on the under in that one as well.

**onthewhat** · 11-26-08, 05:17 PM

Boys...I'm sharp. look at time stamp of my post and the line movement...i nailed em

11/26 03:15PM: 170½ -105 / 170½ -105
11/26 04:56PM: 170½ +104 / 170½ -114
11/26 04:59PM: 169 -105 / 169 -105
11/26 05:04PM: 169 -109 / 169 -101

**onthewhat** · 11-26-08, 05:44 PM

Lock of the Century is no joke guys

**MSUSpartan32** · 11-26-08, 05:54 PM

Mike Brey's teams play no defense. Never have. Game will be up and down, both teams like to run. Players that are tired are effected more defensively, than offensively, IMO. I wouldn't touch the over.

**onthewhat** · 11-26-08, 05:57 PM

No the first thing to go is your jump shot guy

**MSUSpartan32** · 11-26-08, 06:00 PM

We will disagree here. At the end of our practices or in the 4th quarter, my players always magically have energy to play offense. Also, if you are transition based teams (especially secondary break, like UNC), with decent depth, and ALL the TV time-outs, I think you will still get very good looks offensively.

**SportsLockPicks** · 11-26-08, 06:01 PM

Originally posted by MSUSpartan32

Mike Brey's teams play no defense. Never have. Game will be up and down, both teams like to run. Players that are tired are effected more defensively, than offensively, IMO. I wouldn't touch the over.

good call...but you never know...i say the best angle is UNC offense wayyy to good for sub par ND Defense...lay the wood

**onthewhat** · 11-26-08, 06:01 PM

I agree the teams will get their points....but don't see a team approaching 90 which will have to happen for this to go over.

**MSUSpartan32** · 11-26-08, 06:02 PM

Yeah, I hear what "onthewhat" has to say, and it's valid. I just don't think it's the only reason I would take that number, especially with one (IMO) poor defensive team.

**onthewhat** · 11-26-08, 06:03 PM

I know this team is poor on defense, however there comes a time when the number is set too high and has to go under. I think this is one of those times guy. Not disagreeing with you, you make valid points. Just think they set the number way too high.

**MSUSpartan32** · 11-26-08, 06:06 PM

Gluck, man. I am going to really enjoy watching this game.........without money on it, of course, unless I like those 2nd half numbers!!!!!

**RkD KiD** · 11-27-08, 12:02 AM

**feartheunderdog** · 11-27-08, 12:06 AM

wowww....this thread musta killed some people tonight

**MSUSpartan32** · 11-27-08, 12:07 AM

Jump shots seemed OK to me.........tough loss.

**TPowell** · 11-27-08, 12:15 AM

onthewhat I wish I would have listened to you. I'm seriously not even going to bash you about losing you're play. Notre Dame was tired like half way into the first half.

**pinck13a** · 11-27-08, 12:16 AM

To bad Mcalarny had money on the over!!

If Mac doesnt go ape shit with 3's with about 6 minutes left, Carolina would have been content with milking the clock (which is what they were starting to do)

**TPowell** · 11-27-08, 12:17 AM

Mac must have had the over and almost out of pot money. I still love that guy though!

**onthewhat** · 11-27-08, 01:41 AM

i thought i had a winner until about 12 mins left..then had a bad feeling

**kipper32** · 11-27-08, 02:03 AM

Nice bet

**TPowell** · 11-27-08, 02:06 AM

onthewhat I was giving you respect for being right about the tired legs thing but then you come in and trash me in the other topic

**onthewhat** · 11-27-08, 02:07 AM

just said stop talking about louisville in a ND discussion

**pinck13a** · 11-27-08, 09:50 AM

Originally posted by onthewhat

i thought i had a winner until about 12 mins left..then had a bad feeling

I thought it was a good pick...shit happens