I had this wager on Steve Francis on whether or not he would hit a FT, and it explicity states that No FT's attempted is a No (saw something on this earlier but could not find it).
He missed a FT BUT he did not start and it was graded no action (even though the bet did not say that it required him to start). So this is likely the issue in that other dispute.
Likewise I bet Kyle Korver to not miss and he did not attempt a FT. Here, he also did not start, and it was graded no action.
While clerks will explain it as "No" means "no one wins" instead of "no action" they're just grasping at straws and the real reason here is whether or not someone starts. Good that there is a rule.
N G
He missed a FT BUT he did not start and it was graded no action (even though the bet did not say that it required him to start). So this is likely the issue in that other dispute.
Likewise I bet Kyle Korver to not miss and he did not attempt a FT. Here, he also did not start, and it was graded no action.
While clerks will explain it as "No" means "no one wins" instead of "no action" they're just grasping at straws and the real reason here is whether or not someone starts. Good that there is a rule.
N G