The media has shown time and again how easy it is to manipulate people. We've seen it a ton of times. When there was only one woman(there still is only one woman) that had brought charges against Cosby, the majority of public opinion didnt really believe it. When the number of allegations got to 5, public opinion said nah this is a setup, a moneygrab. When the number got to 10 public opinion said hmm, Im starting to think he may have did it, when the numbers kept growing and ultimately 50+ public opinon said he's obviously guilty. So once again the media established whats always been true for the overwhelming public and that is one can believe in a small conspiracy but not a big one. No research, no nothing, there is so much about the case they dont bring up, seems the numerous allegations are to deflect about the actual case because if anyone actually looked into it theyed revert back to what they though previously and that is she's full of it and this is indeed a moneygrab.
-
Comment -
The liberal media has always had it out for Bill Cosby.
Tell me some more of your theories, Jtoler.Comment -
You are absolutely nuts if you put your life into the hands of a jury. Some of the dumbest, most ghetto, trailer trash people are on jury's.
I just mentioned this in this thread I think. But the last time I was on a jury, half the people wanted to convict a guy with zero evidence just like this shit. The reason they thought he was guilty? Well, he looked guilty. WTF? Well one of these ghetto ladies who would not budge tells me. "Hey, we're probably going to get a lot of money out of this the longer we're here". She mentions that she was on a jury the year before that lasted 3 months. I told her... "this damn trial better not get nearly that long". So we finally had a verdict 5 days later (5 days too damn long). I go over to her and ask, "by the way, how much money did you make on that last jury?" She tells me... "I made a lot of money on that one, I got a check for $635 dollars". If you would have saw my face. I was beet red angry. I felt like I could have slapped that ghetto lady right there.
That is who you are dealing with... No such thing as a jury of your peers.Comment -
Years ago, Bill Cosby came into my restaurant and asked to be seated in the kitchen so
he wouldn't be bothered. I said that I could set up a table in the room behind the kitchen and he
said okay.
No comatose females were left behind or anything.
At the time I didn't realize J-E-L-L-O meant L-U-D-E-S.
Comment -
What are you talking about? Payback for Rodney King? What? The officers that beat Rodney King were later convicted in federal court on civil rights violations. That was in 1992. OJ was 3 years later. What payback? Who wanted payback? Huh???
The first jury vote, only 2 jurors had guilty. It was very easy to flip them. It had nothing to do with black. It had to do with wealth. OJ was as white as they come.
I lived in LA. LA county went bankrupt paying out lawsuits from LAPD crooked cops. I don't know anyone that lived in LA back then that did not know someone that was illegally arrested by LAPD. White, Hispanic, black, Asian, whatever. I met a Hispanic man that had his life ripped apart because of phony cops. They planted heroin on him and guns. He was totally innocent. His fiance dumped him, his family rejected him. His own mom didn't believe him because of the huge amount of indisputable evidence. His mom went to her grave telling him to just admit his wrongs. He did 5 years in jail over it. He can never get those years back. He can never get his family back. He was never able to clear his name with his mom. He had a pending lawsuit with the city when I met him. I'm almost in tears writing this remembering his story. These are real peoples lives.
Do your research. The police were even corrupt with their own officers. There was no honor among these thieves.
The Los Angeles City Council approved a $20.5-million settlement Wednesday to bring to a close lawsuits brought by four Los Angeles Police officers who alleged that they were falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted during the city's Rampart police corruption scandal that began in the late 1990s.
City officials said they hoped the payout -- which comes as they face a projected $433-million budget deficit next fiscal year -- would be the last major financial blow related to the Rampart scandal.
The city has already paid $75.5 million to civilians.Comment -
-
Don't tell Gloria Allred. She'll be representing you on CNN tonight.Years ago, Bill Cosby came into my restaurant and asked to be seated in the kitchen so
he wouldn't be bothered. I said that I could set up a table in the room behind the kitchen and he
said okay.
No comatose females were left behind or anything.
At the time I didn't realize J-E-L-L-O meant L-U-D-E-S.Comment -
Ahh, that's why Maggie said payback. I forgot about this woman. I saw the 30 for 30. I'll take her word for it but I don't think it was Rodney King at all. I believe it was the communities lack of trust with LAPD that cleared OJ, combined with a prosecution that botched every piece of evidence there was. If you would have tried this case among sane people, they would all say not guilty. Not because OJ was innocent BUT because the prosecution didn't have proof. Once again I ask, what evidence tied OJ to the crime? Blood/DNA? it was proven (actually admitted) that LAPD planted the blood/DNA. The crime scene was compromised the evidence room was compromised the Forensic doctor was compromised. My God, how much can you fukk up?Comment -
Several people on the jury said it was payback. The whole black community said it was payback. The things you are saying lead me to believe you know nothing about the OJ case.Comment -
What several people on the jury??? Who the fukk is the whole black community? When did they talk to you?
25 years later, some old lady says it was payback for an event that happened 3 years prior and you believe that shit?
Who in their right mind would think that 2 people deserved to die as payback for someone getting their ass kicked??? The media loves to spin things and you eat that shit up.Comment -
That is a story told by the defense with zero basis in reality. Standard blood evidence procedure was turned into a wild frame accusation. So they planted his blood on the bronco and planted a bloody glove exactly where an eyewitness, they hadn't even talked to ,said he was. They also planted scratches on his hand and staged the famous bronco chase where OJ was in the back seat crying and threatening to kill himself if they didn't let him go to his mommy's house. Obviously the actions of an innocent man.Comment -
What proof was presented? You are losing me?
Mark Fuhrman admitted on tape that he planted evidence. Judge Ito would not admit that part of the tape to the jury. The defense then called him to the stand and he proceeded to plead the 5th because he knew he would have went to jail. He still perjured himself by saying he never used the N word as an officer. It was real easy for the defense to find where he did that. They also found that he had falsified police documents as well. Of course he pleaded the 5th on that too.
So Furhman, conveniently was the only officer to have found the bloody glove. The glove that did not fit. Case fukkin closed.Comment -
LOL a differing account from CNN (a fake news organization) is now incontrovertible proof...oh but yeah OJ was innocentGee whiz... You are wrong again. That didn't take long.
However, a different juror told CNN affiliate WPXI that jurors were in a "true deadlock" and that votes were generally split along 7-5 or 5-7 votes for most of the deliberations.
I guess you will now claim that 5, 6 or 7 of the jurors were black or Mullato or Yellow boned???
. This shit isn't even funny anymore. Maybe you are a paid troll IDK. No one who can type legible sentences could be as dense and obtuse as you have been in this thread and others.
It isn't even fun or rewarding to constantly point out your logical failures and hypocritical statements. You and your garbage posts are a weed filled yard that just has to be constantly mown.Comment -
In an interview with Channel 11's Aaron Martin, the juror said the votes were 7-5 or 5-7 for most of the deliberations. The juror spoke on the condition of anonymity, but allowed Channel 11 News to record and use their voice.
“Whatever the man did, he's already paid a price and suffered,” the juror said. "There's no question he gave her a pill."
Who the fuk cares what the vote was like during deliberations. What matters and what I referred to was the final vote. "He already paid a price and suffered"...what a load of bs
Comment -
You should do your research. The supreme court threw out any assertions that someone running is guilty. It's simply not true. Human nature is to fight or flight. Just because someone runs does not mean they are guilty. What would you do if you feared for your freedom or your life? You don't have to answer because no one knows what you will do in that instance.
There are standard procedures in forensics. LAPD did not follow any of them. They broke every protocol for blood sampling, collecting and testing. That in itself lends to reasonable doubt. Bottom line... They fukked up. Why can't you admit that the prosecution bumbled the case. OJ may be guilty as sin. I think he did it... BUT based on what I know about LAPD and based on how they fukked up in this case, there would be no way I could convict a man of murder when ALL the evidence was botched.Comment -
Still hasnt been an answer to why Cosby allegations true and Trump's not, why is that question blatantly dodged?Comment -
The juror (who sounds white) cleared up what the original juror said. That juror said that on 1 of the accounts, they did a poll and it was 10-2 but when they were going to submit that to the judge, several jurors said that no they didn't want their vote to reflect guilty on that 1 charge. They then took another count and it was 7-5. It stayed 7-5 the rest of the way on that count. So you have 3 counts, I'm not sure how the other counts went but they were deadlocked. You tried to imply that the 2 that made that initial vote were black. We may never know who they were but the vote that counted had 7-5. So your theory of bad black jurors pissing on the justice system is in error.In an interview with Channel 11's Aaron Martin, the juror said the votes were 7-5 or 5-7 for most of the deliberations. The juror spoke on the condition of anonymity, but allowed Channel 11 News to record and use their voice.
“Whatever the man did, he's already paid a price and suffered,” the juror said. "There's no question he gave her a pill."
Who the fuk cares what the vote was like during deliberations. What matters and what I referred to was the final vote. "He already paid a price and suffered"...what a load of bs
This juror is saying what any common sense person should be saying. Why the fukk am I here when this case was originally settled in 2005?Comment -
Mac(OJ's not guilty)4lyfe's whole M O is to projectile vomit so much trash that you can't keep up with cleaning it all.Comment -
My God man
Fuhrman was questioned by the defense team, invoking his Fifth Amendment right on all questions, including the question, "Did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case?"
If you are a police officer that was at the scene of a crime, why would you ever plead the 5th on this question? You just state the facts. His ass was busted. Game over man.
He admitted on tape that LAPD OFTEN planted evidence. Do you need a connect the dot, etch a sketch to figure it out? He perjured himself on the stand. Why would you believe anything this idiot said anyway???
Furhman was connected with the glove and blood that was vital to this case. He was the best witness for the defense.Comment -
Every article about the jury refers to the 10-2 votes on 2 of the three counts. The only one disputing that is fake news CNN, and mac4lyfe says that juror said such and such. It sure wasn't on audio. Very likely CNN is either lying about it or conveniently misinterpreted what he said.Comment -
Okay, it's clear you have no idea what you're talking about.
He was forced to take the Fifth Amendment on every question asked to him. The defense knew this, and that's the reason F Lee Bailey proposed the question that you have quoted out of context.
My God, this is basic, common stuff, man.
Your inability to extrapolate what's in front of you is a little alarming.Comment -
I have had several concussions but I'm not sure what you mean by me not remembering the OJ case? I'm talking about the OJ case and the Cosby case at the same time, so of course I'm all over the map, so maybe you are thinking some of my responses to the Cosby trial is those of the OJ trial. Try to keep up.
What do I need to clear up? Furhman pleaded the 5th when asked if he had planted evidence. You tell me what that means???Comment -
You are factually incorrect every way possible. You are believing that the blood was mishandled solely on a fairytale from a bunch of scumbag pathological lawyers who made up the entire thing. It was completely refuted by the prosecution. The defense hired a lying expert who wanted to get paid and said whatever they wanted him to say. He was totally refuted yet you believe it. You are either a troll or the most uninformed human on the planet. There were other blood matches we aren't even discussing. You stated that it was a fact that Fuhrman admitted to planting evidence on tape. 100% false. He said he never used the N word and they had him on tape saying it. Nothing at all about planting evidence, ever. When it was obvious he was going to be charged for perjury for the N word testimony, his lawyer rightly told him to take the 5th after that and did so on each question.
Like I said, you are either a liar or just stupid. In no way was planting of evidence even remotely shown except for the story telling. Even as of right now you are arguing with proven falsehoods.Comment -
Haha, how many times are you going to be proven wrong before you just admit it???
Please don't tell me you don't have speakers on whatever device you post with.Comment -
It clearly shows that CNN was using this as their source for the story. Seriously, are you retarded????Haha, how many times are you going to be proven wrong before you just admit it???
Please don't tell me you don't have speakers on whatever device you post with.Comment
