Hey Jimmymac

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MBENZ
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 01-07-07
    • 5238

    #1
    Hey Jimmymac
    Congrats on the ruling in your favor,but I think you should know who was really behind it.The guys posting handle is Pier0 and he owns a bookmaker review site which I wont mention to stay inside SBR posting rules.While Shrink and Mo were trying to figure your plight out,this guy was solving it.Just thought you might want the real story:

    The story of the public company is a bit complicate. I'm not even sure the public company is still trading. As a matter of fact neither Oddsmaker or Betonusa make mention of it on their web sites while Betonusa for sure used to.

    I think what really happened is that the thieves that used to own (and probably still own in part) Oddsmaker needed a new look and used this Germany public company first called betonusa ag, then miobet, but then some kind of pump and dump scam went down (I guess scammers cannot refrain themselves) and that's the last I heard of the public company (maybe 18 months ago) on the bookmaker site.

    However I remained in touch with the guy that was the CEO and part owner of the public company and the few times I dealt myself with Oddsmaker complaints I always spoke to him who was always able to solve the problems and this time was no differernt. When he told me he was going to look into the case, few hours later EOG announced that the player was going to get paid.

    Even if Shrink changed his mind about the player, does anyone really think that Oddsmaker would have paid simply because Shrink changed his mind?
    Shrink with his new opinion about the player still needed OM to authorize the payment. And in the list of people involved in the case published by Shrink himself, I don't see anyone who can take such a decisiion, which is why I sent the e-mail in the first place.

    This is the last comment you will hear from me on this case. For me it is not important who did what. If EOG needs the recognition so bad they can have it. To me they are clowns and people who believe them are gullible players who probably deserve to lose money. I'm not even sure why someone like Mofome gets paid to moderate a forum. I wouldn't hire him to clean my shoes. At least the SBR moderators they can take on a complaint with the confidence givern by their betting experiences and the strong connections of SBR as a site. What does Mofome knows or bring to the table beside 1 million posts, none of interest?
  • AgainstAllOdds
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 02-24-08
    • 6053

    #2
    Solid motherfuking post pal.


    Originally posted by SBR_John
    AAO = good dude. Buying you a drink in Vegas buddy.
    Comment
    • SBR_John
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 07-12-05
      • 16471

      #3
      Good job pier. We have always respected his work.

      These things happen in Forumville. The EOG brass sided with the book and got burned alive. They went to plan B which was to lie and say they did not really mean to side with the scam book and call the player a thief. That in fact their ruling and siding with the scambook was part of their plan.. cough, cough, bullshit,.. to double scam the scam book! ..."and if you'll buy that I'll throw in the Golden Gate for free"

      This is one of those cases where honesty would have been the best policy. If they would have come forward and just simply said guys we are very sorry, we are wrong, we will reverse our verdict and try to get this guy paid; they would have had the respect of the majority. We all make mistakes. But to pretend it was all part of a plan is insulting even to the mentally challenged. Its amusing that they think posters are that stupid to buy their story. I would of loved to be in the meeting where they hatched this plan. I'm sure they asked each other if the posters could be dumb enough to believe them.
      Comment
      • Marco C
        SBR Rookie
        • 09-08-07
        • 41

        #4
        Originally posted by MBENZ
        Congrats on the ruling in your favor,but I think you should know who was really behind it.The guys posting handle is Pier0 and he owns a bookmaker review site which I wont mention to stay inside SBR posting rules.While Shrink and Mo were trying to figure your plight out,this guy was solving it.Just thought you might want the real story:

        The story of the public company is a bit complicate. I'm not even sure the public company is still trading. As a matter of fact neither Oddsmaker or Betonusa make mention of it on their web sites while Betonusa for sure used to.

        I think what really happened is that the thieves that used to own (and probably still own in part) Oddsmaker needed a new look and used this Germany public company first called betonusa ag, then miobet, but then some kind of pump and dump scam went down (I guess scammers cannot refrain themselves) and that's the last I heard of the public company (maybe 18 months ago) on the bookmaker site.

        However I remained in touch with the guy that was the CEO and part owner of the public company and the few times I dealt myself with Oddsmaker complaints I always spoke to him who was always able to solve the problems and this time was no differernt. When he told me he was going to look into the case, few hours later EOG announced that the player was going to get paid.

        Even if Shrink changed his mind about the player, does anyone really think that Oddsmaker would have paid simply because Shrink changed his mind?
        Shrink with his new opinion about the player still needed OM to authorize the payment. And in the list of people involved in the case published by Shrink himself, I don't see anyone who can take such a decisiion, which is why I sent the e-mail in the first place.

        This is the last comment you will hear from me on this case. For me it is not important who did what. If EOG needs the recognition so bad they can have it. To me they are clowns and people who believe them are gullible players who probably deserve to lose money. I'm not even sure why someone like Mofome gets paid to moderate a forum. I wouldn't hire him to clean my shoes. At least the SBR moderators they can take on a complaint with the confidence givern by their betting experiences and the strong connections of SBR as a site. What does Mofome knows or bring to the table beside 1 million posts, none of interest?
        Reads a little clearer that way, Mercedes.

        An unbelievable story of deceit by the two poltroons at EOG.
        Comment
        • englishmike
          SBR Hall of Famer
          • 06-19-08
          • 5279

          #5
          Good work Benz. Whilst most of us were only guessing Shrink and Mo are totally ineffective, it's good to get confirmation.
          Comment
          • BGS 9.5
            SBR MVP
            • 01-10-08
            • 4628

            #6
            Decision was rendered in favor of the player days ago, let this shit die.....
            Comment
            • dirty
              SBR Hustler
              • 10-27-06
              • 68

              #7
              Great Job by pier0.... He is one of the good guys
              Comment
              • BGS 9.5
                SBR MVP
                • 01-10-08
                • 4628

                #8
                Originally posted by dirty
                Great Job by pier0.... He is one of the good guys
                Dirty, great to see you man
                Comment
                • Tsoprano
                  BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                  • 04-14-08
                  • 26374

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dirty
                  Great Job by pier0.... He is one of the good guys
                  Agreed, solid work!!

                  Excellent post, Benz.





                  ....Eog....
                  Comment
                  SBR Contests
                  Collapse
                  Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                  Collapse
                  Working...