To create this race of champions, select officials from Churchill Downs analyzed past-performance information for each of the 13 Triple Crown winners and also researched the respected opinions of distinguished horse racing experts who have evaluated those horses’ achievements and put them into historical perspective.
The results of this research led to each horse getting assigned a “fundamental probability,” as Inspired Entertainment refers to it — basically, the overall chance that horse has to win this race.
The horse assigned the highest winning probability isn’t necessarily going to cross the virtual finish line first Saturday evening. Rogers compared the process for choosing a winner to the NBA lottery system and its ping-pong ball display.
“Essentially, the result is determined by a weighted lottery system,” he said. “So think of the NBA lottery — if there were 100 numbered table tennis balls, and one is drawn to determine the winner. Twenty of the balls in the bin may have the number of the horse considered to be the favorite in the race. And then the horse deemed to be the longest shot in the field may only have two of the balls. Now, in the end, the randomly drawn ball is going to determine the winner.
“We have fed into their computer models and assessed, basically, a win probability percentage for each horse.”
So, just like in real horse races, luck — good and bad — will play a factor. The “best” horse won’t necessarily win the race. An upset could occur.
Though there is no official wagering through Churchill Downs on Saturday’s virtual race, veteran oddsmaker Mike Battaglia has a set a morning line. Secretariat — the 1973 champion who many consider to be the greatest Thoroughbred in American racing history — is the 7-2 favorite.
“I’ve got to give Secretariat the edge,” said Battaglia, who has set the morning line at Churchill Downs since 1974. “This was a really fun morning line to make and I’m looking forward to the race.”
The longest shots are Assault, Sir Barton, Gallant Fox and Omaha, all at 20-1.
“I didn’t have the heart to hang more than 20-1 odds on a Triple Crown winner!” Battaglia quipped in a press release this week.
Rogers said it’s important to note that Battaglia was not aware of the probabilities Churchill Downs and Inspired Entertainment used to create Saturday’s race, and his morning line is “totally independent” of the data provided to make the final result. (The independent gambling website BetOnline.Ag released its own odds Thursday — with Secretariat as a 2-1 favorite — and that site is actually taking wagers on the virtual race).
Rogers also noted that the probabilities assigned to each horse were based on research encompassing that horse’s entire career, not just the races leading up to each Triple Crown winner’s respective Derby. And if you’re handicapping at home, you don’t have to take the slop into account. Unlike the past few Kentucky Derbys, which have been soaked with rain, the simulated edition will be run under ideal conditions.
“Since it’s a fantasy, it’s sunny and 75 and we have a fast track,” Rogers said.
This virtual race has already been run. Rogers said only two people at Churchill Downs know the result. He estimated a similar number of people on the NBC Sports production crew, as well as a small number at Inspired Entertainment, had also seen it.
I'm not sure I'd personally recommend offering odds on trust the gaming company & racecourse people & NBC can all keep it a secret. But can't hurt to ask.
I'm not sure I'd personally recommend offering odds on trust the gaming company & racecourse people & NBC can all keep it a secret. But can't hurt to ask.
Opti, this can be just like the Puppy Bowl all over again and we can get rich!
I have to go in another direction than secretariat... sure he's the most likely winner but won't be weighted as heavily in their process factoring in they're looking at whole careers
I have to go in another direction than secretariat... sure he's the most likely winner but won't be weighted as heavily in their process factoring in they're looking at whole careers
Taking that into account, Affirmed, Count Fleet and War Admiral would be worth a few bucks at decent odds.
Taking that into account, Affirmed, Count Fleet and War Admiral would be worth a few bucks at decent odds.
yes I think that's the smart way to go..ap and secretariat too obvious..justify makes no sense for obvious reasons (6 races)..take one with a longer career which all of the above that you mentioned did
not even sure that's legit as back to citation and before it was common to run more frequently than modern times..so really not a fair comparison..if you stick with a modern horse after secretariat affirmed had the most starts and also the closest time to secretariats of the bunch