I'm not saying anything about betting against your picks. What I am saying is you don't have enough samples to make a mathematical conclusion that teams playing in London won't make the Super Bowl, when one already has.
I'm also saying, that to make any mathematical conclusion about anything, you need a minimum of 10,000 samples. It's been proven over many decades if not centuries.
So, here is my conclusion for you to take in consideration. You cannot trust trends in sports or put much weight to them. Example, Team A is 20-7 at home ATS against team B. Does that tell you team A is more likely to cover against team B in this contest? It depends, but probably not. One is the bookmaker knows that stat, secondly, you don't have enough samples mathematically to draw that conclusion with any certainty.
Just sayin', not hatin'
Good luck this season.
I'm also saying, that to make any mathematical conclusion about anything, you need a minimum of 10,000 samples. It's been proven over many decades if not centuries.
So, here is my conclusion for you to take in consideration. You cannot trust trends in sports or put much weight to them. Example, Team A is 20-7 at home ATS against team B. Does that tell you team A is more likely to cover against team B in this contest? It depends, but probably not. One is the bookmaker knows that stat, secondly, you don't have enough samples mathematically to draw that conclusion with any certainty.
Just sayin', not hatin'
Good luck this season.