Indianapolis Colts +8

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • raiders72001
    Senior Member
    • 08-10-05
    • 11018

    #456
    Will PFF give you a refund?
    Comment
    • asiagambler
      SBR Hall of Famer
      • 07-23-17
      • 6831

      #457
      Originally posted by raiders72001
      Is this the guy that's played 15 games in the last 3 years ?
      Comment
      • asiagambler
        SBR Hall of Famer
        • 07-23-17
        • 6831

        #458
        "Entrenched blindside blocker"

        How is he entrenched? On the bench?
        Comment
        • raiders72001
          Senior Member
          • 08-10-05
          • 11018

          #459
          I think a LT that can the whole year allowing 1 sack and 0 hits is pretty good.
          Comment
          • asiagambler
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 07-23-17
            • 6831

            #460
            Originally posted by raiders72001
            I think a LT that can the whole year allowing 1 sack and 0 hits is pretty good.
            HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHA. That's why you're not very bright. Sacks aren't a very good indicator of future performance or even present performance for that matter. All stuff that's way wayyy over your head though
            Comment
            • raiders72001
              Senior Member
              • 08-10-05
              • 11018

              #461
              How many more guys on the current practice squad are better than the starters?
              Comment
              • asiagambler
                SBR Hall of Famer
                • 07-23-17
                • 6831

                #462
                Originally posted by asiagambler
                HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHA. That's why you're not very bright. Sacks aren't a very good indicator of future performance or even present performance for that matter. All stuff that's way wayyy over your head though
                One day I'll teach you about that
                Comment
                • raiders72001
                  Senior Member
                  • 08-10-05
                  • 11018

                  #463
                  Originally posted by asiagambler
                  HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHHAHA. That's why you're not very bright. Sacks aren't a very good indicator of future performance or even present performance for that matter. All stuff that's way wayyy over your head though
                  get a refund.
                  Comment
                  • asiagambler
                    SBR Hall of Famer
                    • 07-23-17
                    • 6831

                    #464
                    Originally posted by raiders72001
                    How many more guys on the current practice squad are better than the starters?
                    Arthur Maulet > Ardarius Washington
                    Comment
                    • raiders72001
                      Senior Member
                      • 08-10-05
                      • 11018

                      #465
                      Originally posted by asiagambler
                      Arthur Maulet > Ardarius Washington
                      Washington started one game in his whole career. Get a refund.
                      Comment
                      • asiagambler
                        SBR Hall of Famer
                        • 07-23-17
                        • 6831

                        #466
                        Originally posted by raiders72001
                        Washington started one game in his whole career. Get a refund.
                        I'm just going by you. You counted him as a starter (how else would there be 10 starters out?)
                        Comment
                        • asiagambler
                          SBR Hall of Famer
                          • 07-23-17
                          • 6831

                          #467
                          How did practice squad player Maulet do today ?
                          Comment
                          • raiders72001
                            Senior Member
                            • 08-10-05
                            • 11018

                            #468
                            Originally posted by asiagambler
                            I'm just going by you. You counted him as a starter (how else would there be 10 starters out?)
                            Wrong but I'm not going back to the pattern where I have to correct everything you say.

                            What's so good about this 30 year old practice squad player?
                            Comment
                            • asiagambler
                              SBR Hall of Famer
                              • 07-23-17
                              • 6831

                              #469
                              Originally posted by raiders72001
                              Wrong but I'm not going back to the pattern where I have to correct everything you say.

                              What's so good about this 30 year old practice squad player?
                              The only reason you didn't explicitly count him is because you were clueless as usual. He was definitely the ? nickelback in your original reply though. So he was one you counted as part of the 10 players
                              Comment
                              • asiagambler
                                SBR Hall of Famer
                                • 07-23-17
                                • 6831

                                #470
                                Originally posted by raiders72001
                                Wrong but I'm not going back to the pattern where I have to correct everything you say.

                                What's so good about this 30 year old practice squad player?
                                4 tackles including 1 TFL, tipped pass that led to INT

                                Plenty of starting experience with Pitt but we count him as a practice squad player anyway
                                Comment
                                • asiagambler
                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                  • 07-23-17
                                  • 6831

                                  #471
                                  You like picking on Mekari, how did the other 14 practice squad players do ?

                                  Players like Maulet
                                  Comment
                                  • raiders72001
                                    Senior Member
                                    • 08-10-05
                                    • 11018

                                    #472
                                    Originally posted by asiagambler
                                    4 tackles including 1 TFL, tipped pass that led to INT

                                    Plenty of starting experience with Pitt but we count him as a practice squad player anyway
                                    I'd throw out everything that happened in today's game. I'm guessing there will be a new backup QB game 6.
                                    Comment
                                    • asiagambler
                                      SBR Hall of Famer
                                      • 07-23-17
                                      • 6831

                                      #473
                                      Originally posted by raiders72001
                                      I'd throw out everything that happened in today's game. I'm guessing there will be a new backup QB game 6.
                                      Why? Does the QB run the ball 30 times a game too ?
                                      Comment
                                      • raiders72001
                                        Senior Member
                                        • 08-10-05
                                        • 11018

                                        #474
                                        The feel good stories are nice, but next you'll be telling me that Maulet's more important to the Ravens than Roquan Smith.

                                        You don't see the same game the rest of us see. It's obvious that the loss of Watson was the cause of the loss of the game. No team can win with that QB in the game. You come up with strange theories to fit your agenda.
                                        Last edited by raiders72001; 10-02-23, 03:22 AM.
                                        Comment
                                        • raiders72001
                                          Senior Member
                                          • 08-10-05
                                          • 11018

                                          #475
                                          duplicate
                                          Last edited by raiders72001; 10-02-23, 03:45 AM.
                                          Comment
                                          • raiders72001
                                            Senior Member
                                            • 08-10-05
                                            • 11018

                                            #476
                                            He barely threw during practice this week, and the Browns listed him as questionable while holding out hope he’d be able to play.But after a 10-minute pregame workout watched closely by head trainer Joe Sheehan, coach Kevin Stefanski and general manager Andrew Berry, Watson informed the Browns he couldn’t go.
                                            “He pushed himself. He tried,” said Stefanski. “He did everything in his power to get ready, but just did not feel comfortable earlier this morning and didn’t feel like we could put him out there. He knows his body. I trust him.
                                            https://apnews.com/article/deshaun-w...0couldn't%20go.
                                            Comment
                                            • raiders72001
                                              Senior Member
                                              • 08-10-05
                                              • 11018

                                              #477
                                              This is what most of us saw
                                              The 23-year-old, who made 48 starts in college, rarely appeared confident and his stat line — 19 of 36 for 121 yards — didn’t fully capture his struggles. Thompson-Robinson threw several passes that were nearly picked off, and the three the Ravens grabbed were balls he forced into tight coverage.


                                              Watson wouldn't talk after the game
                                              Stefanski said there was no structural damage in Watson's shoulder. The CBS broadcast mentioned "fluid" on the shoulder, but he wouldn't confirm or deny that report.
                                              "Specifics, I don't know," Stefanski said. "But structurally he's OK."
                                              Last edited by raiders72001; 10-02-23, 03:52 AM.
                                              Comment
                                              • asiagambler
                                                SBR Hall of Famer
                                                • 07-23-17
                                                • 6831

                                                #478
                                                Originally posted by raiders72001
                                                The feel good stories are nice, but next you'll be telling me that Maulet's more important to the Ravens than Roquan Smith.

                                                You don't see the same game the rest of us see. It's obvious that the loss of Watson was the cause of the loss of the game. No team can win with that QB in the game. You come up with strange theories to fit your agenda.
                                                Maulet was just an example of a player that filled in and played at the level of or better than the starter he was replacing. And this was easily predictable if you looked beyond just "practice squad player called up to replace starter"

                                                Roquan Smith has nothing to do with anything except that IF he was ruled out, that WOULD be an injury that mattered MUCH MORE than the ones that didn't. He wasn't so you're just arguing about nothing here

                                                Cleveland didn't lose because of Watson or no Watson. Baltimore was BY FAR the superior team that day. Their defense was better, their running game was better, their special teams were better, their coaching was better. They were the better team all around. You have to give credit to their defense for MAKING DTR look that bad. Watson wasn't changing that result

                                                I'm ready to end this feud

                                                You made some bets. You will make some more bets
                                                Comment
                                                • raiders72001
                                                  Senior Member
                                                  • 08-10-05
                                                  • 11018

                                                  #479
                                                  Originally posted by asiagambler
                                                  Maulet was just an example of a player that filled in and played at the level of or better than the starter he was replacing. And this was easily predictable if you looked beyond just "practice squad player called up to replace starter"

                                                  Roquan Smith has nothing to do with anything except that IF he was ruled out, that WOULD be an injury that mattered MUCH MORE than the ones that didn't. He wasn't so you're just arguing about nothing here

                                                  Cleveland didn't lose because of Watson or no Watson. Baltimore was BY FAR the superior team that day. Their defense was better, their running game was better, their special teams were better, their coaching was better. They were the better team all around. You have to give credit to their defense for MAKING DTR look that bad. Watson wasn't changing that result

                                                  I'm ready to end this feud

                                                  You made some bets. You will make some more bets
                                                  The only reason for the loss was the QB. Cleveland forced Balt to punt first series. Cleveland got the ball threw an interception that led to 7 and the game was over. QB threw 3 picks, averaged 3.4 yds/pass with a QB rating of 25.3. Cleveland can't score a TD in 4 games with that QB.
                                                  Comment
                                                  • raiders72001
                                                    Senior Member
                                                    • 08-10-05
                                                    • 11018

                                                    #480
                                                    Holding my nose today and taking the Giants. They must give Jones time and I'm definitely worried about that.
                                                    Comment
                                                    SBR Contests
                                                    Collapse
                                                    Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                                    Collapse
                                                    Working...