And it hurt Lamar not having Beckham. Beckham's Y/R was 13.2. Y/T 9.4. Jackson's Y/A were 6.52 in the game. You're a casual fan and just look at stats.
raiders do you really think the betting market doesn't know about twitter ?
Everything you say just makes me laugh at this point. So keep going please
The books such as Bookmaker have people monitor Twitter. I try to get that info. You wait for the report to come out. Then you get the closing line. You'll continue to donate each week doing that.
And it hurt Lamar not having Beckham. Beckham's Y/R was 13.2. Y/T 9.4. Jackson's Y/A were 6.52 in the game. You're a casual fan and just look at stats.
HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH you literally just posted stats. I was talking about his play on the field and didn't say anything about his stats
Raider, your notes are fascinating. Like any market, there's a difference between:
*(Adjustment on the Market Line) vs (Adjustment in Fair Value).
I told you my basic thoughts:
1) So many Fantasy FB players view the RB/WR as a big loss. Sometimes, those players are not a big loss.
2) I am biased to the value of Offensive Linemen. I used to have success playing against depleted Off Lines. I think it's harder now. It's a hyper-competitive league, so some dropoffs are small.
3) Of course, there's value on the starting QB going out. If you listen to ANY post-game from a coach, they'll say the Backup didn't get many reps. If he's now starting, he improves timing via more reps in practice.
Good points. I love looking at the trenches especially injuries that may cause more pressure on the QB. All these QBs are great if not pressured.
The books such as Bookmaker have people monitor Twitter. I try to get that info. You wait for the report to come out. Then you get the closing line. You'll continue to donate each week doing that.
Attacking me isn't going to make you look any less the fool here but I get you're down bad so go for it. But keep entertaining me is all I ask
HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH you literally just posted stats. I was talking about his play on the field and didn't say anything about his stats
Are you really this hilarious ?
But you don't know why his play was bad. Did you see receivers getting open deep? Did the field look condensed on passing downs? Were the exchanges always good between C and QB.
Attacking me isn't going to make you look any less the fool here but I get you're down bad so go for it. But keep entertaining me is all I ask
You actual bore me because you're not that bright. I never heard of you until this thread because I spend my time in the BTC forum. Chucky throws in some good thoughts.
But you don't know why his play was bad. Did you see receivers getting open deep? Did the field look condensed on passing downs? Were the exchanges always good between C and QB.
I know exactly why his play was bad. I said the reasons many times. Of course I saw receivers get open deep because I watched the all-22. Even now I'm helping you
You actual bore me because you're not that bright. I never heard of you until this thread because I spend my time in the BTC forum. Chucky throws in some good thoughts.
you = johnnyvegas
That chucky dotes on both of you makes it all the more hilarious
Good points. I love looking at the trenches especially injuries that may cause more pressure on the QB. All these QBs are great if not pressured.
Yeah. Tonite, Bakhtiari/Jenkins out for the Packers. And i'm guessing that:
*VERY FEW noticed the two missing Off Linemen.
*But A LOT of people tracked Watson/Jones. Jones (btw) has been a Non-Factor on return.
You'll laugh. I used to track every 5-man Off Line in the NFL. When a Favorite had a personnel change on the Off Line, they were ripe.
...As I said above, I don't think it works as well now. Lines are sharp, and no real Favorite bias.
I know exactly why his play was bad. I said the reasons many times. Of course I saw receivers get open deep because I watched the all-22. Even now I'm helping you
You don't comprehend anything that you look at because there's a processing problem. You think 3 practice squad players can replace three starters. I wouldn't even start to discuss any type of math or analytics with you. Way beyond your comprehension.
You don't comprehend anything that you look at because there's a processing problem. You think 3 practice squad players can replace three starters. I wouldn't even start to discuss any type of math or analytics with you. Way beyond your comprehension.
Name the 3 practice squad players and name the 3 starters they replaced
Name the 3 practice squad players and name the 3 starters they replaced
That's the problem. You don't know or think they are equal. Already posted but here it is again.
You and the truth don't go hand in hand. You said the 7 injuries didn't matter because the backups were as good. Then I just let your nonsense go.
1. The Bears didn't want Mustifer. He then got cut by the Colts and picked up by Bal on waivers. He's lucky to still be in the NFL. 2. Drake was signed to the practice squad. 3. Moon was on the practice squad.
Those three is why they lost. The bad snap wasn't caused by the weather, it was a miscommunication. Drake lost a fumble and Moon whiffed picking up a fumble.
The practice squad backups that you claimed to be as good as the starters, one better than the starter, cost the game.
Ojabo started in place of the injured "starter" Oweh
102nd time
You definitely have a processing problem. He was going to be an edge rusher even without the injury and was going to play. Also depth is part of the problem when you bring up players.
Harbaugh
John Harbaugh said OLB Jeremiah Moon is going to play Sunday vs. Colts.
You definitely have a processing problem. He was going to be an edge rusher even without the injury and was going to play. Also depth is part of the problem when you bring up players.
Harbaugh
Yes he was going to play. Congratulations you understand the reason they elevated him from the practice squad. He was DEPTH, nothing more. He was NOT going start. He DIDN'T start. I NEVER said he wouldn't play. YOU insisted that he was starting and a week later and 6 pages into this you STILL do. Processing problem
Chucky - you're right about cluster injuries in football. AG wanted to use baseball stats since it's pitcher vs. batter and is easily quantifiable no matter how many injuries occur. It doesn't work that way for football.
Found this article that explains it better than I am.