Ha! You jinxed his ass, lol Congrats to what? Losing? Never say “miracle” and “Congrats” when karma is in play.
Ahh the soccer gods.
Wasn't trying to jinx. Looks like he was smart and bet Chelsea to win at 14/1 towards the end to get something out of this. Both people who came close to win the $1000, had tremendous hedge opportunities with minimal risk especially when you don't pay to play in this contest. How often as a gambler you get presented with the opportunity to choose how much money to win without sweating the bankroll as you don't need a bankroll to play this contest?
I often looked at player props and didn't bet, because they were +230 or even +205. I assumed posting +200, when current odds were, in fact, longer, was illegal.
So once these two winners on Tatis and Lindor are verified, this fun-filled, insane contest will be officially over.
Well done, regardless of whether you win or get DQed on a technicality lol!
Wasn't trying to jinx. Looks like he was smart and bet Chelsea to win at 14/1 towards the end to get something out of this. Both people who came close to win the $1000, had tremendous hedge opportunities with minimal risk especially when you don't pay to play in this contest. How often as a gambler you get presented with the opportunity to choose how much money to win without sweating the bankroll as you don't need a bankroll to play this contest?
I actually got Lindor HR at +435 and over 1.5 bases at +122 at crypto books. Made more money here, than on my small Chelsea +1400 ticket the other day.
I often looked at player props and didn't bet, because they were +230 or even +205. I assumed posting +200, when current odds were, in fact, longer, was illegal.
So once these two winners on Tatis and Lindor are verified, this fun-filled, insane contest will be officially over.
Well done, regardless of whether you win or get DQed on a technicality lol!
they won't get by Andy or Opti. Of course you can't use +200 if the odds were longer.
they won't get by Andy or Opti. Of course you can't use +200 if the odds were longer.
Not up to me. But like you guys I have been thinking have to use the correct posted odds so if over +200 I could not take it. It's not really a mathematical advantage though I guess.
Shame this is coming down to rule issues on multiple entries this month.
Not up to me. But like you guys I have been thinking have to use the correct posted odds so if over +200 I could not take it. It's not really a mathematical advantage though I guess.
Shame this is coming down to rule issues on multiple entries this month.
I am not saying he used a greater than +200 odds prop and posted +200, but if he did, then the only thought that goes through my head is "This is why we can't have nice things!" A free contest
Several times I wanted to use a prop bet where the odds were over +200, and just barely over in many cases, but I would never consider purposely changing those odds because that's obviously against the rules.
Wasn't trying to jinx. Looks like he was smart and bet Chelsea to win at 14/1 towards the end to get something out of this. Both people who came close to win the $1000, had tremendous hedge opportunities with minimal risk especially when you don't pay to play in this contest. How often as a gambler you get presented with the opportunity to choose how much money to win without sweating the bankroll as you don't need a bankroll to play this contest?
Totally agree bro. You try to help them and good advice gets ignored by noobs.