Conspiracy theory time.
Sportsinsights and wagerline are designed to help the players out but they take adversiting from books and even sportsinsights has features where they interview line managers from various books who give "tips" about the action on games.
This makes absolutely no sense to me....on the one hand sportsinsights is a tool used to beat the sportsbooks but then they openly interview line managers who are suppose to be giving you inside info which is suppose to help you out. Is it possible that they are misleading us?
Am I missing something here???? Any ideas/theories guys?
Sportsinsights and wagerline are designed to help the players out but they take adversiting from books and even sportsinsights has features where they interview line managers from various books who give "tips" about the action on games.
This makes absolutely no sense to me....on the one hand sportsinsights is a tool used to beat the sportsbooks but then they openly interview line managers who are suppose to be giving you inside info which is suppose to help you out. Is it possible that they are misleading us?
Am I missing something here???? Any ideas/theories guys?