Who says 75% isnt possible? I win 75% ITT.

[sideloaded]

Thread is probably dead...fun for a while. Straight Winners time for another ghost account.

[MartinBlank]

That was meant to be posted a long time ago, i didnt hit submit on accident and when my girlfriend got on the computer for a minute she hit submit much later. You think i would add a play that already started? Especially one that is losing?

Ahhhh, I see.

You have enough money to build your own ship, you make countless sums of money for your clients----but you can't afford a second computer for your girlfriend?

They are 250 bucks at Costco for Cripes sake.

Ask you mom for a loan and buy your girlfriend her own computer.

[MartinBlank]

This is just cruel.

UCF scores again.

Updated record......

3-3, DOWN 6.45 Units for the night.

All this guy needs to do is go 70-21 the rest of the way......

[big0mar]

[dante1]

I believe this makes you 6-5. Not positive but I believe so. That is about 55%, far cry from 75%. But even worse is the fact that you now must select at about 78%. More than likely after the weekend it will be over 80%, What do you think about that?

When are you going to disappear?

[MartinBlank]

There is one more item of bullshit here.

He listed his play as Anaheim +1.5, -120.

The only problem with that is-----THAT LINE DOES NOT EXIST.....I didn't see that wager anywhere below -220. Another typo? Or just fictional lines? I linked the lines history below this post.

This guy told us he wouldn't make a single play over -140. Yet his Anaheim play was -220---at the lowest.

This guy is a world class bullshitter me thinks.

[sideloaded]

Guy is a statistical engineer, must be legit.

[MartinBlank]

Here it is....

This is from Legends---but the lines are nearly universal across the board.

Line History:
Vancouver Canucks vs Anaheim Ducks

PUCKLINES
10/13 08:15 -1½ +210 / +1½ -250
10/13 09:23 -1½ +200 / +1½ -240
10/13 09:59 -1½ +195 / +1½ -235
10/13 14:09 -1½ +200 / +1½ -240
10/13 22:06 -1½ +180 / +1½ -220

[dante1]

There is one more item of bullshit here.

He listed his play as Anaheim +1.5, -120.

The only problem with that is-----I didn't see that wager anywhere below -220. Another typo? Or just fictional lines?

Didn't this guy tell us he wouldn't make a single play over -140. Yet his Anaheim play was -220---at the lowest.

This guy is a world class bullshitter me thinks.

Yes he did. So he will probably be resorting to 200 games and higher to attempt to fudge his record.
Doesn't keep his word either. Mostly 110's. lol

Problem with guys like this is they usually aren't even good fade material because they will end up very close to 50%. What to do with them?

[sideloaded]

Pretty sure he already left for good.

[jazz]

Sure are a lot of people worried about him

[big0mar]

Here it is.... This is from Legends---but the lines are nearly universal across the board. Line History: Vancouver Canucks vs Anaheim Ducks PUCKLINES 10/13 08:15 -1½ +210 / +1½ -250 10/13 09:23 -1½ +200 / +1½ -240 10/13 09:59 -1½ +195 / +1½ -235 10/13 14:09 -1½ +200 / +1½ -240 10/13 22:06 -1½ +180 / +1½ -220

[csm506]

Biggest thing of all guys he talks about not betting a game because it is on TV, he does the research and bets games based on stats, knowledge and experience, then like a true gambler which you will not admit, you played the last game on tonights card to bail out of the early loses. If you loved this game early why was this selection not posted with the Marshall. UCF game or the Buf vs NJD under???? You tried to bail like many of us do and you love the action. Everything you say you are is not different then thousands of us. Go away or just come clean.

[Albert Pujols]

This guy is a scamming clown. End of story.

[Jonah]

Your girlfriend knows how to hit submit???

Not saying that she is is dumb, just that she knows the site...like opens up the window an hour later and goes "oh he probably wanted to hit submit, let me do that for him.

Kind a strange.

[Jonah]

For the record, I would like to see this thread continue and for you to battle back...Stay strong.

[thepig]

I am absolutely sure of that.

As I have pointed out to you before---if you really were able to hit that number----or even get close to it---you would not be here on SBR posting. Any number near 70% pretty much guarantees you winning the Vegas Hilton Super Contest----which would pay you roughly 210K.

Yet, here you are. Posting on a bulletin board telling the entire world how big/bad you are.

This has JJ written all over it. It always drives up traffic, and I would expect when you don't get near 75% in the next week or so, you will disappear.

Ghosts such as yours have come and gone.

Forget the Hilton. If he could hit a 'mere' 60 percent over a thousand plays. 3 plays a day for a year. 5 percent of BR per play. 10000 starting BR would be 5 million+ over 1000 wagers. If he hit 70 percent over that period he'd be one of the richest people in the world. He's hoping he does 60-70 percent over 100 plays so that saps and dumb kids PM him and join his 'service'.

[thepig]

Obviously talking about when the full 100 plays are over. I will hit 75% and have plenty of time to get there.

You have no chance at hitting 75 percent now and even these people know it.

[MartinBlank]

I guess he isn't really going to tell us why he started listing -220 games---

Oh well, this was fun.

[james4512]

The guy was just hoping by some miracle he would go like 8-2 we would all be like omg this guy so good and then he would try and sell us picks. On to the next forum to try and sell picks

[csm506]

James I think you are correct, why else would he be here unless to make money. If any of us take the time to research a game you improve your chances by 20% or more GL guys,

[hhsilver]

There is one more item of bullshit here.

He listed his play as Anaheim +1.5, -120.

The only problem with that is-----THAT LINE DOES NOT EXIST.....I didn't see that wager anywhere below -220. Another typo? Or just fictional lines? I linked the lines history below this post.

This guy told us he wouldn't make a single play over -140. Yet his Anaheim play was -220---at the lowest.

This guy is a world class bullshitter me thinks.

Martin,

It seems you are missing the good old days of last year , before you know who was driven out. Those were fun times.

( let's not name "you know who" in order to keep this thread on topic )

[wal66]

Martin,

It seems you are missing the good old days of last year , before you know who was driven out. Those were fun times.

( let's not name "you know who" in order to keep this thread on topic )

You mean...........................

"No Moderator dares to ban me!"

[mmike032]

smells like PapaGeorge in here

[MartinBlank]

"SHOW YOURSELF MOD"

Those were fun times with that lunatic.

[statnerds]

When is today's Card going to be posted?

[MartinBlank]

When is today's Card going to be posted?

Stat....it appears his run is over. Unless he can post his picks after the games are over, and he can create his own lines.

[Justin7]

75% isn't so hard if you can past-post dogs that are leading.

[MartinBlank]

75% isn't so hard if you can past-post dogs that are leading.

Right you are Justin--and you are forgetting.....

With imaginary lines to back you up in case you lose-----

He listed the play at -120---when the lowest any book had it was -220.

[Ninersnut]

This dude just got flamed into oblivion....

[big0mar]

Didn't even last 24 hrs!

[dante1]

Didn't even last 24 hrs!

Small possibility that this guy is good and he just over reached in an attempt to impress or pave the way for a scam. Maybe, he can hit close to 60% consistently, which btw is also very difficult but at least possible. So he put himself into a difficult pressure filled situation and pushed himself and made some very poor decisions.
And then some of you guys were really brutal lol and that didn't help at all. lol again

If he is a scam artist he will more than likely show up with a similar story. Or maybe he is at work right now and will try again tonight. I hope so. It was entertaining.

[G's pks]

Would you guys settle for 40% and I can just keep bragging?

[big0mar]

Small possibility that this guy is good and he just over reached in an attempt to impress or pave the way for a scam. Maybe, he can hit close to 60% consistently, which btw is also very difficult but at least possible. So he put himself into a difficult pressure filled situation and pushed himself and made some very poor decisions. And then some of you guys were really brutal lol and that didn't help at all. lol again If he is a scam artist he will more than likely show up with a similar story. Or maybe he is at work right now and will try again tonight. I hope so. It was entertaining.

A. The guy brought it on himself. If he thinks he can get to 75%, great. I'll be the first to cheer him on. But don't come here saying you've hit 72% without documentation.

B. If this guy really hit 72%, he wouldn't be pressing. Period.

[StraightWinners]

If you guys think I am leaving after 11 plays you are wrong. Im obviously not going to count the Anaheim winner because of the way it was posted (even though it happened to be losing when it was posted) If you think it was anything other than an honest mistake you are just trying to stir the pot.

Anyway, the rest of my posts in this thread will just be picks. Im here to hit 75% not argue with children.

Spreadsheet is updated.

OVERALL RECORD 6-5 (55%) +2.6 units 89 picks remaining

Thursday October 14th Plays

College Football

Kansas State -3 Game -110 for 5 units
Kansas State -1.5 1st half -110 for 4 units
South Florida/WV Under 45 -110 for 4 units

NBA

Charlotte/Orlando Under 191 pts -110 for 4 units
Cleveland Cavs PK -110 for 4 units

NHL

Carolina Hurricanes Moneyline +120 for 5 units
Minnesota Wild -1.5 Goals +200 for 3 units