Imagine how much better the lakers could even be w/o this bullshit contract. They might have been able to keep Ariza AND sign Artest two season ago if it wasn't for Pukes contract. Instead, they have Puke riding pine and Artest getting old.
This is why the Lakers haven't been able to trade him. He has one of the worst contracts (organizational standpoints) in the league. He got paid because his Dad mingled.
No, he played over his head in his contract year, and the Lakers paid thinking he would continue to play like that.
No, they paid him thinking he would be better the next season, and then better after that, and continue to improve. Not only has he not improved, he's actually regressed.
No, they paid him thinking he would be better the next season, and then better after that, and continue to improve. Not only has he not improved, he's actually regressed.
Regressed as in being totally useless. I love the commentators...
"Luke has a very high basketball IQ"
"Luke understands the triangle offense better than anyone"...
There has to be a better reason why he is staying for that amount.
They have no choice. They can't cut him. They can't trade him. There's literally nothing they can do unless some team gets desperate and they can dump his salary as part of a bigger deal.
he really shouldnt be in the league at all. if his name was Luke Smith would he even make it in europe? seems unfair in general that he is taking a spot in the NBA. this is the only pro league where this would fly, more theatre than sport........i bet he finishes his career as a Celtic pulling in about $4m per season
he really shouldnt be in the league at all. if his name was Luke Smith would he even make it in europe? seems unfair in general that he is taking a spot in the NBA. this is the only pro league where this would fly, more theatre than sport........i bet he finishes his career as a Celtic pulling in about $4m per season
I could probably name 50 current NBA players who are nowhere near as GOOD as Walton at basketball. Give it a break eh.
This wouldn't even make the top 10 worst contracts in the NBA.
I don't know. If you're talking dollar for production, it'd be up there. Luke Walton basically hasn't played, at all, for 2 straight seasons. His back is so bad that he has considered retirement the last few seasons. So they've basically paid out a good portion of this contract for nothing, i mean, almost absolutely nothing. It's hard to find guys who have produced literally 0 for this type of money outside of ming and oden. but they aren't as bad of contracts b/c they are actually worth the money they're being paid when healthy. Puke at his best ever, isn't worth half of what he's making.
I could probably name 50 current NBA players who are nowhere near as GOOD as Walton at basketball. Give it a break eh.
walton is horrible. every shot he takes is an open 14 footer yet he shoots 30%. he is undersized, cant play D, cant jump, and is a subpar athlete. and this in what should be the prime of his career. you could take thousands of NCAA players the past 5 years (now jobless) and with the opportunities he has recieved, they would play much much better than this guy.....$5.3/yr, thats worthy of an NBA starter, imagine walton started on an NBA team ....most of his numbers are put up in trash time and they still stink. no one here is defending walton, you simply cant. 50 players worse that make more than him, ya right