this is a hard one to be honest. monfils just has that "wow" factor that just can't be overlooked. but monfils is not 100% and is playing a 100% fit and healthy federer and looks to have regained his confidence and hunger that got him so many grand slams.
i guess at the end of the day, it comes down to whether you think monfils can take a set off fed. if you do, then the obvious play is the over. but if you think fed wins this in straight sets, then play the under.
That's a pretty obvious statement.
Or you could've bet Fed 3-0 or AOR, which had Fed at like +102 and AOR at -113 at Pinnacle.
[quote=jjgold;5683305]I win again like usual
[/quote]
[quote=Whippit;7921056]miami won't lose a single eastern conference game through end of season[/quote]
I think Monfils will challenge Fed in all sets, but fed will take 3 straight, probably one in tie break.
During the first set, but still.
jj gets no credit for this because he's repeatedly said Federer is done and can't compete against the top players. Load of bollocks. Federer is still the third best player in the world.
jj gets no credit for this because he's repeatedly said Federer is done and can't compete against the top players. Load of bollocks. Federer is still the third best player in the world.
Yes............Monfils is not a top player Son..he has won shit