No one on this site wins

**JayLA** · 09-17-21, 01:44 AM

True

**lonegambler23** · 09-17-21, 05:00 AM

macker not liking married and kid life, men dont get married

**ChuckyTheGoat** · 09-17-21, 07:14 AM

Originally posted by cincinnatikid513

cool story

Hey, Mack:

*Have a nice weekend.

You know the JJ Gold line: "Losing a LITTLE = winning!"

**TATUMUS** · 09-17-21, 08:17 AM

Originally posted by Mackballs

Bunch of washed up degenerate hardos coming out the woodwork recently talking about being winning bettors lol...fukkin spare me. All am attention seeking, tiny rooster measuring contest. oOoOO look at me I posted ONE play and it won, c'mon guys tell me I'm awesome and how I'm down 250k lifetime is irrelevant because I had Louisiana -20 tonight. Nobody has systems, fukkin models, stfu. If you did you wouldn't be on this site arguing with fukkin robot accounts and cellar trolls 24/7 about "updating records" and "tracking plays"...I'm not better, down tens of thousands in my life. At least I got a fuckin clue and accept it. Quit lying to your fukkin selves and show a little accountability. If you're mad, you can type about it.

Congratulations on your streak of one.

**lonegambler23** · 09-17-21, 12:56 PM

dont take your shiiit out on us

**alling** · 09-17-21, 01:08 PM

Agreed. This site is this best place to follow to get winning fade material.

**dante1** · 09-17-21, 01:20 PM

Originally posted by alling

Agreed. This site is this best place to follow to get winning fade material.

lol, the op is very close to being correct. the correct comment would be almost nobody wins, in the long run. these are not just words. I booked for over two decades and every book i know claims...he is the only bookie who loses. that is BS, none of them lose unless they are total screw ups and even then.

believe me when i tell you much less than 1% of players win in the long run. you may win a season or two maybe if you are incredibly lucky you can have a winning year. a winning career, practically impossible. if you have any clue concerning probability this will only be common sense to you.

what about the clowns who claim to win. make this challenge. ask them to post their plays for an entire year. i will bet my $1000 to your $1 they will end up losing.

no winners is pretty close to correct. i witnessed it for over 20 years.

**KVB** · 09-17-21, 01:27 PM

Love these threads.

**dante1** · 09-17-21, 01:31 PM

Originally posted by KVB

Love these threads.

if you love these threads you would have had a ball if you were an original SBR member. that is when every other week some clown claimed he could win and would prove it. every one, every last one tried and failed. I don't do a hell of a lot of SBR reading any longer but it seems to me those clowns have basically become very scarce in SBR.

it was comical one would show up, produce a record in the low 40's, be laughed at and another one would appear. ask some of the members who have been around for 10 years plus.

**JayLA** · 09-17-21, 05:59 PM

Originally posted by dante1

lol, the op is very close to being correct. the correct comment would be almost nobody wins, in the long run. these are not just words. I booked for over two decades and every book i know claims...he is the only bookie who loses. that is BS, none of them lose unless they are total screw ups and even then.

believe me when i tell you much less than 1% of players win in the long run. you may win a season or two maybe if you are incredibly lucky you can have a winning year. a winning career, practically impossible. if you have any clue concerning probability this will only be common sense to you.

what about the clowns who claim to win. make this challenge. ask them to post their plays for an entire year. i will bet my $1000 to your $1 they will end up losing.

no winners is pretty close to correct. i witnessed it for over 20 years.

there are some winners on this site but yea

**Eddy Munny** · 09-17-21, 06:12 PM

Originally posted by dante1

lol, the op is very close to being correct. the correct comment would be almost nobody wins, in the long run. these are not just words. I booked for over two decades and every book i know claims...he is the only bookie who loses. that is BS, none of them lose unless they are total screw ups and even then.

believe me when i tell you much less than 1% of players win in the long run. you may win a season or two maybe if you are incredibly lucky you can have a winning year. a winning career, practically impossible. if you have any clue concerning probability this will only be common sense to you.

what about the clowns who claim to win. make this challenge. ask them to post their plays for an entire year. i will bet my $1000 to your $1 they will end up losing.

no winners is pretty close to correct. i witnessed it for over 20 years.

Why do bookies claim they lose if they don't? What's the point of that?

**BeatTheJerk** · 09-17-21, 06:16 PM

The only reason why I am up is because I’ve hit over +250k in parlays the last two decades.

**ChuckyTheGoat** · 09-17-21, 10:55 PM

Originally posted by dante1

lol, the op is very close to being correct. the correct comment would be almost nobody wins, in the long run. these are not just words. I booked for over two decades and every book i know claims...he is the only bookie who loses. that is BS, none of them lose unless they are total screw ups and even then.

believe me when i tell you much less than 1% of players win in the long run. you may win a season or two maybe if you are incredibly lucky you can have a winning year. a winning career, practically impossible. if you have any clue concerning probability this will only be common sense to you.

what about the clowns who claim to win. make this challenge. ask them to post their plays for an entire year. i will bet my $1000 to your $1 they will end up losing.

no winners is pretty close to correct. i witnessed it for over 20 years.

dante, appreciate your post. What you say mirrors what I hear from books. The asterisks might go like this:

*Over the course of a SEASON...a book will have a few players that Net to the +$. So, maybe 5% of the players will Net +$ in a given football SEASON.
*So what? It's only a matter of time b4 they give it back. And now they have more AMMUNITION to bet.
*I've had heard some books state that they booked for 20+ years...and didn't have one NET winner. Not one.

And let's say the book detects that the guy might be a winner. Something unusual about his betting patterns, something that sets him apart. How ez is it to cut him off? Why book someone who might beat u? Only way u book him is if you're convinced he's going to win...and then YOU can bet out on his plays.

**konck** · 09-18-21, 08:25 AM

Hey in the famous pk 6 players go 70% for most of the year
Who cares if they get to watch a few quarters before they pk

**hawkwind** · 09-18-21, 12:10 PM

Not True I won a bet in March of 2012