Republican vs Democrat

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Optional
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!

    "panic merchant" ?

    Where is there any evidence of me panicking ... and about what?
    How can you be so un-self aware??

    You machine gun post about how everything Trump/Musk does is leading to disaster daily.

    Panic Merchanting is what you do! Seriously, you cannot even own your own public actions here? Pathetic mate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Originally posted by mjsuax13

    How much money did you make?
    Nothing made ... until I cash out

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Originally posted by Optional



    ^^^ this stuff is like watching the insane asylum inmates arguing with the special bus kids how their guy is always right.

    Do either of you ever take your head out of your bias butts long enough to notice what complete delusional whack jobs you both are?


    Hareeba is the worlds biggest Karen and panic merchant, whilst Dwight has the most amazingly flexible ethics and explanations fo NAYTHING that happens. Even Trump totally back flipping due to the bond markets tanking over his "stable genius" flip flopping mind changes.

    "Countries are kissing me ass. They are dying to make a deal". <-- that is the true words of Trump and how he thinks. No doubt Dwight wont even see the patheticness of a world leader saying kid stuff like that out loud. But the rest of the non-brainwashed, non-extremist people on all sides see it Dwight. You are 100% just as blinkered and sad as Hareeba now.
    "panic merchant" ?

    Where is there any evidence of me panicking ... and about what?

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    And so it begins ...

    FBI Director Kash Patel has been removed as the acting chief of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and has been replaced with the Army secretary, three people familiar with the matter said Wednesday.

    It was not immediately clear why Patel was replaced by Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll to lead the Justice Department agency that’s responsible for enforcing the nation’s gun laws.

    One person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a personnel move, said Patel was removed at the end of February, just days after he was sworn in.

    Also ... where's Elon?

    Leave a comment:


  • Optional
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute

    you reek of desperation as usual. Trump said days ago and even weeks ago, that there could be some short term pain. So he told you when the market might fall and when the market might go up. You laughed and applauded when the market went down, and when it went up (like we all knew it would) you immediately push the narrative you are being told to.



    ^^^ this stuff is like watching the insane asylum inmates arguing with the special bus kids how their guy is always right.

    Do either of you ever take your head out of your bias butts long enough to notice what complete delusional whack jobs you both are?


    Hareeba is the worlds biggest Karen and panic merchant, whilst Dwight has the most amazingly flexible ethics and explanations fo NAYTHING that happens. Even Trump totally back flipping due to the bond markets tanking over his "stable genius" flip flopping mind changes.

    "Countries are kissing me ass. They are dying to make a deal". <-- that is the true words of Trump and how he thinks. No doubt Dwight wont even see the patheticness of a world leader saying kid stuff like that out loud. But the rest of the non-brainwashed, non-extremist people on all sides see it Dwight. You are 100% just as blinkered and sad as Hareeba now.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    No, you don't understand my point. China is not taking Trump's bluff. Trump can't do anything to them as they have no elections so he can force a regime change. Why would China back down on tariffs as it only hurts the US? Last time Trump put tariffs on China he had to bail out the farmers with subsidies as they couldn't sell their soybeans and pork to China.
    why would Trump want regime change in China? Has he hinted or said anything along those lines? Of course he hasn't.

    Pavy, Trump is living in next week already while you are still trying to make sense of what happened 2 weeks ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!


    Absolutely nobody would buy these calls that far out of the money expiring today without knowing something.

    I don’t care how good you are - this rally would not have rocketed like this without news - no way.

    There was absolutely insider information - absolutely.
    you reek of desperation as usual. Trump said days ago and even weeks ago, that there could be some short term pain. So he told you when the market might fall and when the market might go up. You laughed and applauded when the market went down, and when it went up (like we all knew it would) you immediately push the narrative you are being told to.

    Leave a comment:


  • mjsuax13
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!


    Absolutely nobody would buy these calls that far out of the money expiring today without knowing something.

    I don’t care how good you are - this rally would not have rocketed like this without news - no way.

    There was absolutely insider information - absolutely.
    How much money did you make?

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied


    Absolutely nobody would buy these calls that far out of the money expiring today without knowing something.

    I don’t care how good you are - this rally would not have rocketed like this without news - no way.

    There was absolutely insider information - absolutely.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    Originally posted by Hareeba!

    Is the SEC even going to look into the trades made by administration insiders in the last 3 weeks?
    NASDAQ call volume spiked minutes before the 90 day tariff pause was announced. Not a good look at all.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	51
Size:	76.9 KB
ID:	29866556

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    The White House just removed the only public database showing how federal dollars are approved for spending - despite a law requiring it.

    We’ve lost a key tool for transparency and oversight.

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied
    Originally posted by icon
    Absolutely 100% incorrect, or as you like to say "a complete lie". This is about restricting access, not about deciding to not speak to somebody. Don't be so obtuse.

    "Separation of Powers".

    The U.S. Constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law).

    The POTUS isn't a king.

    "[T]he Court simply holds that under the First Amendment, if the Government opens its doors to some journalistsβ€”be it to the Oval Office, the East Room, or elsewhereβ€”it cannot then shut those doors to other journalists because of their viewpoints. The Constitution requires no less," U.S. District Court Judge Trevor N. McFadden wrote in his opinion.
    ~~~

    Icon defending morons who cannot put 2 words together.

    Protesters interviewed were asked what they were protesting about...
    Responses ranged from -- "Everything" to "what's going on in the world".

    Not one specific item could be gleaned from idiot's A through Z.

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied
    Originally posted by pavyracer

    No, you don't understand my point. China is not taking Trump's bluff. Trump can't do anything to them as they have no elections so he can force a regime change. Why would China back down on tariffs as it only hurts the US? Last time Trump put tariffs on China he had to bail out the farmers with subsidies as they couldn't sell their soybeans and pork to China.
    ~~~
    Wavy-
    You don't understand the Chinese economy---

    Trump's s worldwide tariff's strike at the core of Chinese exporters' two main strategies to blunt
    the impact of trade war: moving some production abroad and increasing sales to non-U.S. markets.

    The sweeping tariffs could deal a lasting blow to global demand.
    China is more exposed to the risk of shrinking world commerce than any other nation,
    with economic growth last year relying heavily on running a trillion-dollar trade surplus.

    Kaiyuan Securities expects the new tariffs could slash Chinese exports to the United States by 30%,
    cut overall exports by more than 4.5%, and drag economic growth by 1.3 percentage points.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hareeba!
    replied
    The stages in a Trump deal:

    1. Lie about something being a problem

    2. Do something to "fix" it, which causes an actual problem

    3. Say you won't reverse what you've done

    4. Reverse what you've done

    5. Say "Art of the deal"

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • 19th Hole
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • pavyracer
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute

    further evidence how the radical Left fukking hates America.

    shameful

    No, you don't understand my point. China is not taking Trump's bluff. Trump can't do anything to them as they have no elections so he can force a regime change. Why would China back down on tariffs as it only hurts the US? Last time Trump put tariffs on China he had to bail out the farmers with subsidies as they couldn't sell their soybeans and pork to China.

    Leave a comment:


  • khicks26
    replied
    Originally posted by DwightShrute

    The judge wasn't following the law. He's a political activist. At least in this instance. SCOTUS did good.

    The Shidiot

    Click image for larger version

Name:	The-Shidiot.jpg
Views:	41
Size:	71.8 KB
ID:	29866540

    Leave a comment:


  • DwightShrute
    replied
    Originally posted by jackpot269

    Neither should matter, what the constitution says is all that SHOULD MATTER. But we all know the GOP don't care as long as they get their way. No matter what you or I think should be done. They should follow the law. Or change it thru congress.
    The judge wasn't following the law. He's a political activist. At least in this instance. SCOTUS did good.

    Leave a comment:

SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
Working...