I made a small wager on the boosted line:
"Both Mazatlan and Puebla to score, was +189, now +215" this was accurate, the line for BTS for Mazatlan V Puebla was in fact +189.
However, more than 12 hours after the game, it was graded as a loss, they now said the "booster" was "Both Mazatlan and Pachuca to win, was +189, now +215". The problem there is Pachuca was at least +450 on its own, there is no possible way that was accurate on a side that was +450 AND required another team to win. Actually, a parlay on the 2 in question would have paid about +750 depending what the actual odds at the time were.
So BOL insists, +215 is a better price than +475, not only that, requiring another team to win to get +215. They offered to refund the wager, but it can't be clearer they made an error.
"Both Mazatlan and Puebla to score, was +189, now +215" this was accurate, the line for BTS for Mazatlan V Puebla was in fact +189.
However, more than 12 hours after the game, it was graded as a loss, they now said the "booster" was "Both Mazatlan and Pachuca to win, was +189, now +215". The problem there is Pachuca was at least +450 on its own, there is no possible way that was accurate on a side that was +450 AND required another team to win. Actually, a parlay on the 2 in question would have paid about +750 depending what the actual odds at the time were.
So BOL insists, +215 is a better price than +475, not only that, requiring another team to win to get +215. They offered to refund the wager, but it can't be clearer they made an error.
