bookmaker.eu bug cost me $1300

**bruloc** · 10-31-24, 07:09 PM

*Removed*

**Thefix13** · 10-31-24, 07:32 PM

Do they normally even allow that much action on a single prop? Seems wild

**bruloc** · 10-31-24, 07:51 PM

Originally posted by Thefix13

Do they normally even allow that much action on a single prop? Seems wild

Of course they do. Unlimited re-bets like any other market.

**SirtySree** · 10-31-24, 11:41 PM

I had the exact same issue and got the same response as you. I reported it immediately before the match started.
Hield showed up as Moody and Kuminga showed up as Podziemski.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 12:33 AM

LOL if Bookmaker is taking shots BMR will be out of biz soon.

I trust bm so I think u r both fos

Before anyone says we deserved it for hitting a bad line!! Is all you need to read here.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 12:38 AM

Now after I posted this "Before anyone says we deserved it for hitting a bad line!" Sirtysree updated his post and took that out.

They should ban both of you and keep your money. /thread

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 12:38 AM

Originally posted by bruloc

Of course they do. Unlimited re-bets like any other market.

Total bs

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 12:44 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

LOL if Bookmaker is taking shots BMR will be out of biz soon.

I trust bm so I think u r both fos

Before anyone says we deserved it for hitting a bad line!! Is all you need to read here.

I edited just as you posted so wasn't intentional and was only meant to remove the screenshot, not sentence before it.

Regardless whether you or anyone believes it or not is irrelevant to me. I am looking for someone who can help me and I'm willing to send evidence/discuss it further with said person through PM.

Also in terms of Bookmaker, they are an amazing book and one of my favourites out there. This is an isolated incident so I don't want to publicly put them on blast too much as I am sure this will be resolved eventually.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 12:46 AM

I may be wrong here I'm reaching out now to find out.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 12:50 AM

I'll get u both made right if you aren't lying I sent this thread to my bookmaker contact. If they really made a mistake they will make it right I believe.

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 12:55 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

I'll get u both made right if you aren't lying I sent this thread to my bookmaker contact. If they really made a mistake they will make it right I believe.

Appreciate the help.

I understand the skepticism due to Bookmaker's good record and how unfortunate/shady the timing of my edit looked.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 12:59 AM

The waiting 29 mins and all that bs makes me feel like you took a shot also. If u bet Hield and it was a mistake they have to no and you deserve to win. Waiting 29 mins when it looked like Hield was dead in the water sparks up debate. Yet he ends up with 21 pts and only has 2 when you report it? Moody had 6. A refund is all I'd give but it has to be more than just you 2 who know this happened. The op doesn't notice its Moody in one of his 6 bets until 29 mins later? Oh yea everyone Moody only ended up with 8 pts. hmmmm. If he got 14 does this thread happen?

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 01:13 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

The waiting 29 mins and all that bs makes me feel like you took a shot also. If u bet Hield and it was a mistake they have to no and you deserve to win. Waiting 29 mins when it looked like Hield was dead in the water sparks up debate. Yet he ends up with 21 pts and only has 2 when you report it? Moody had 6. A refund is all I'd give but it has to be more than just you 2 who know this happened. The op doesn't notice its Moody in one of his 6 bets until 29 mins later? Oh yea everyone Moody only ended up with 8 pts. hmmmm. If he got 14 does this thread happen?

I can't speak for OP but for me personally, I can show screenshots that my bets were placed at 2:59, live chat was started 3:03 and match started 3:10.

I asked for the bets to be voided as they clearly weren't correct after I checked the numbers.
Even though at the time of placing the bets I didn't believe they were bad lines, the lines were clearly meant for Moody and Podz as they were in line with other books after checking.
The bets should be voided, not graded as wins (or losses).

It will be hard for many people to report this problem due to the lines only coming out for 10mins before the match started. It also doesn't help that when I refreshed the page 5 mins later, it changed to the correct players.
It resulted in a few people betting the unders once the names were corrected as we pumped the overs incorrectly (I have no evidence to show this part though unfortunately).

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 01:19 AM

I think I believe you but the op def took a shot and said if Moody loses I'll bitch so lets bet this 6 times. Again I reached out and if it happened to both of you they have to no it happened to others. You may be paid in full and should if it was a glitch. BM has some faults but they won't rip you off.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 01:22 AM

1? Sirty how many bets did you place on moody?

**bruloc** · 11-01-24, 01:23 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

Total bs

What? Did you quote the right message? Of course BM allow re-bets.

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 01:26 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

1? Sirty how many bets did you place on moody?

6 bets on each

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 01:32 AM

Originally posted by bruloc

What? Did you quote the right message? Of course BM allow re-bets.

They def allow rebets up to a certain amount depending who you are. I believe you 10000% took a shot knowing it was a glitch. That's just my opinion. Do u honestly think bm gives a fck about 5 300 bets? I've been doing this over 30 years and the answer is no. I believe there may of been a glitch, if u keep betting into it then call foul after your scam loses that my friend is called a shot taker. They should refund you then show you the door if there was a glitch.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 01:36 AM

So you both bet 6 bets on Hield and never realized it's Moody? What was Hields o/u b4 the game? I don't have that? Does anyone else?

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 01:44 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

So you both bet 6 bets on Hield and never realized it's Moody? What was Hields o/u b4 the game? I don't have that? Does anyone else?

OP did 4 on Hield. I bet 6 on Hield and 6 on Kuminga.

I only realised because I went into my 'My Open Bets' to check how much I had on both. It's not possible to realise instantly as the wager gets accepted with the correct player like in OPs screenshot. All my bet were in quick succession as well.

The lines everywhere was opened so close to tip off and varied a lot. All I remember was Pinnacle opening as one of the first at 17.5 for Hield and got instantly hammered a lot. Not sure what it closed at but both Hield and Kuminga ended up coming off the bench which is why everyone was hitting the unders.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 01:52 AM

This is out of my pay grade now. Optional, Tell both these guy's how fos they are. So everyone was taking under? Yet u both took over on good ole' Buddy coming off the bench with 2 points? Bottom line here BM will answer me so we will all no real soon.

**bruloc** · 11-01-24, 02:00 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

The waiting 29 mins and all that bs makes me feel like you took a shot also. If u bet Hield and it was a mistake they have to no and you deserve to win. Waiting 29 mins when it looked like Hield was dead in the water sparks up debate. Yet he ends up with 21 pts and only has 2 when you report it? Moody had 6. A refund is all I'd give but it has to be more than just you 2 who know this happened. The op doesn't notice its Moody in one of his 6 bets until 29 mins later? Oh yea everyone Moody only ended up with 8 pts. hmmmm. If he got 14 does this thread happen?

4 bets, mate.

I reported it as soon as I could. Moody had 6 and Hield had 0 or 2, I don't know for sure. It was early into the second quarter, as I said. Moody made almost half of the points needed to win the bet just in the first quarter and I reported it anyway (while Hield's was off the pace). This proves my honesty and good intentions.

How can this be called "taking a shot"? Like, wtf?

They had more than enough time to void a -EV bet for them and they didn't.

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 02:03 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

This is out of my pay grade now. Optional, Tell both these guy's how fos they are. So everyone was taking under? Yet u both took over on good ole' Buddy coming off the bench with 2 points? Bottom line here BM will answer me so we will all no real soon.

People were taking unders on 17.5 driving it down. Getting 13.5 on overs is still good value by a point or two as the average line likely would've been 15.5. Plus Warriors have been running a deep rotation playing bench players big minutes. Just because people are taking unders doesn't mean I can't take over.

I don't understand why you are getting so worked up over this part. Bad line or not, it is irrelevant to what we are discussing here.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 02:04 AM

No it doesn't

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 02:08 AM

I never once said anything about a bad line? I said you knew it was a glitch seen it called your buddy and jumped on the Glitch.

You may get your chump change back but your going to lose a great book and be considered a shot taker? Was it worth it? I don't even have to talk to BM and know what you did.

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 02:10 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

I never once said anything about a bad line? I said you knew it was a glitch seen 6 pts on Moody and jumped.

You may get your chump change back but your going to lose a great book and be considered as a shot taker? Was it worth it? I don't even have to talk to BM and know what you did.

This was a prematch bet, not live and I reported it instantly and before the match started.

I feel like you are trying to talk to two different people at once as what OP did differently was reported it when the match started.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 02:12 AM

Originally posted by SirtySree

This was a prematch bet, not live and I reported it instantly and before the match started.

I feel like you are trying to talk to two different people at once as what OP did differently was reported it when the match started.

I actually believe you I don't believe the OP. I 100% think there was a glitch. It's how you bet and act after what counts.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 02:15 AM

Originally posted by bruloc

4 bets, mate.

I reported it as soon as I could. Moody had 6 and Hield had 0 or 2, I don't know for sure. It was early into the second quarter, as I said. Moody made almost half of the points needed to win the bet just in the first quarter and I reported it anyway (while Hield's was off the pace). This proves my honesty and good intentions.

How can this be called "taking a shot"? Like, wtf?

They had more than enough time to void a -EV bet for them and they didn't.

Do you think these books are morons? You reported it cuz you thought Hield was dead and you knew Moody was also dead. Plz stfu bro.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 02:16 AM

Sirty what was Moodys o/u b4 the game plz

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 02:23 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

Sirty what was Moodys o/u b4 the game plz

Average line for Moody and Podz would've been about what BM had. They simply just mixed up the names of the players.
My post from earlier in case it was missed.
"I asked for the bets to be voided as they clearly weren't correct after I checked the numbers.
Even though at the time of placing the bets I didn't believe they were bad lines, the lines were clearly meant for Moody and Podz as they were in line with other books after checking.
The bets should be voided, not graded as wins (or losses)."

**bruloc** · 11-01-24, 02:25 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

They def allow rebets up to a certain amount depending who you are. I believe you 10000% took a shot knowing it was a glitch. That's just my opinion. Do u honestly think bm gives a fck about 5 300 bets? I've been doing this over 30 years and the answer is no. I believe there may of been a glitch, if u keep betting into it then call foul after your scam loses that my friend is called a shot taker. They should refund you then show you the door if there was a glitch.

Sorry, my english is not that good and maybe I didn't understand you, but are you saying I knew I was betting on Moody and did keep betting it anyway? And after that I decided to report it when those bets were in a good pace to win? This don't make any sense, mate.

Relax and try to think more about it. Not everyone is dishonest and is trying to scam a book, some are honest and have no bad intentions. I believe I already proved it.

And, yes, I believe BM don't give a f*** about $1300. I already made thousands of bets with them. They are honest and a good and reputable book. But that doesn't mean they can't be wrong sometimes.

**2Sweeet** · 11-01-24, 02:26 AM

Originally posted by SirtySree

Average line for Moody and Podz would've been about what BM had. They simply just mixed up the names of the players.
My post from earlier in case it was missed.
"I asked for the bets to be voided as they clearly weren't correct after I checked the numbers.
Even though at the time of placing the bets I didn't believe they were bad lines, the lines were clearly meant for Moody and Podz as they were in line with other books after checking.
The bets should be voided, not graded as wins (or losses)."

I agree but if you had Hield and bet b4 the match as u said and there was a glitch u should win Hield. Wtf is Podz was it a parlay? and did Podz not get there? U mean Brandin?

**bruloc** · 11-01-24, 02:30 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

Do you think these books are morons? You reported it cuz you thought Hield was dead and you knew Moody was also dead. Plz stfu bro.

How tf Moody was dead w/ 6 points and 2 minutes into the second quarter? He had almost 3 quarters to score 8 points.

**SirtySree** · 11-01-24, 02:33 AM

Originally posted by 2Sweeet

I agree but if you had Hield and bet b4 the match as u said and there was a glitch u should win Hield. Wtf is Podz was it a parlay? and did Podz not get there?

Podz is Podziemski. They mixed up two players/different bets. They wrote Hield but it showed up as Moody in the open bets and they wrote Kuminga instead of Podziemski. OP just had the mix up with Hield but I had the mix up with another player too.