WagerHub confiscates $1,900 from player

**Dad** · 04-26-10, 07:36 PM

No way Jose will I ever play at WagerHub now.

**Vince Lombardi** · 04-26-10, 08:48 PM

I wish those mother****ers would stop calling me and begging me to play with them. That will never happen.

**DBurton81** · 04-27-10, 11:33 AM

I can't believe these pieces of shit try to keep calling players to deposit with them!

**dark star** · 04-27-10, 06:56 PM

Chuckaroo where are you?????

**BET THE HOOK** · 04-28-10, 10:59 AM

They finally quit calling me. I really did like Chuck and Tom but they dont make the rules so they cant right the ship.

**DBurton81** · 04-28-10, 11:46 AM

I actually like Chuck and Tom too....but Gia and a few others there are the managers that have absolutely ruined the book.

**relaaxx** · 04-28-10, 11:13 PM

i still think they can save this book. give dburton his $1900. this thread may last forever. WAGERHUB loses money forever. it's only $1900. and you were wrong from the begining. put your pride aside. do the right thing. forget the agreement. every week there are new posters who state they wil not deposit at WAGERHUB after reading this thread.

**FattyMcFatso** · 04-29-10, 02:31 PM

Originally posted by relaaxx

i still think they can save this book. give dburton his $1900. this thread may last forever. WAGERHUB loses money forever. it's only $1900. and you were wrong from the begining. put your pride aside. do the right thing. forget the agreement. every week there are new posters who state they wil not deposit at WAGERHUB after reading this thread.

Don't forget my $1,400

**Dark Horse** · 04-29-10, 04:14 PM

SBR should just fork over the 3300 (1900 +1400) to these two players, along with a public apology for allowing a D- book to advertise on its forum for weeks. That is, if they value the relationship of trust between players and SBR at more than 3300. If you want to be the watch dog that holds books accountable to the highest standards (which, I realize, SBR used to do), then you must hold yourself to the same standard.

SBR made a mistake, and admitted as much. There are consequences to that mistake. If you want to make Players Talk so dumb that you don't even read it yourself anymore, just so you can have more advertising revenue, at least step up to the plate when a handful of square players get burned as a direct consequence.

**nenad** · 04-29-10, 05:56 PM

Originally posted by FattyMcFatso

Don't forget my $1,400

**SBR Lou** · 04-29-10, 06:36 PM

Originally posted by Dark Horse

SBR should just fork over the 3300 (1900 +1400) to these two players, along with a public apology for allowing a D- book to advertise on its forum for weeks. That is, if they value the relationship of trust between players and SBR at more than 3300. If you want to be the watch dog that holds books accountable to the highest standards (which, I realize, SBR used to do), then you must hold yourself to the same standard. SBR made a mistake, and admitted as much. There are consequences to that mistake. If you want to make Players Talk so dumb that you don't even read it yourself anymore, just so you can have more advertising revenue, at least step up to the plate when a handful of square players get burned as a direct consequence.

You'd make a good lawyer. I like how you sensationalize all of your points. I wish we caught all promotional posts the second they were made, but the reality is moderators cannot be everywhere at all times. If we could, we wouldn't need the report post icon ( ) that posters can use. I'm surprised that given your complete frame of reference with everything WagerHub related, and your obvious recognition of the low-grade sportsbook that they are, that you didn't take it upon yourself to alert a moderator that spam was taking place?

If someone saw a WagerHub offer posted inside of a thread and decided to send them money, despite the fact that WagerHub was initiated at D- by SBR and subject of numerous complaint reports on SportsbookReview, I do feel sorry and ask those players to submit a sportsbook complaint form so that in the event that WagerHub decides to stop robbing players, we can follow up on their behalf.

**HedgeHog** · 04-29-10, 07:11 PM

Originally posted by Dark Horse

SBR should just fork over the 3300 (1900 +1400) to these two players, along with a public apology for allowing a D- book to advertise on its forum for weeks. That is, if they value the relationship of trust between players and SBR at more than 3300. If you want to be the watch dog that holds books accountable to the highest standards (which, I realize, SBR used to do), then you must hold yourself to the same standard.

SBR made a mistake, and admitted as much. There are consequences to that mistake. If you want to make Players Talk so dumb that you don't even read it yourself anymore, just so you can have more advertising revenue, at least step up to the plate when a handful of square players get burned as a direct consequence.

So SBR should just pay everyone that sends money to a shit book?

**saints7011** · 04-29-10, 08:36 PM

SBR moderators cannot see everything that goes on , recently I brought a minor problem with an avatar to lou's attention and almost emediately he corrected the problem , point is , you see something , report it , I'm sure SBR would have looked into it...

**DBurton81** · 05-04-10, 11:06 AM

Anyone heard from WagerHub lately?

**Dark Horse** · 05-04-10, 03:12 PM

Originally posted by CrazyLou

You'd make a good lawyer. I like how you sensationalize all of your points. I wish we caught all promotional posts the second they were made, but the reality is moderators cannot be everywhere at all times. If we could, we wouldn't need the report post icon ( ) that posters can use. I'm surprised that given your complete frame of reference with everything WagerHub related, and your obvious recognition of the low-grade sportsbook that they are, that you didn't take it upon yourself to alert a moderator that spam was taking place?

Right.

Let's all sing the praises of SBR and recognize that they don't make mistakes. After all, even in the face of this obvious mistake, all responsibility can be sidestepped with a simple: "it's not our fault, it's your fault."

Hallelujah!

**jackkkk2009** · 05-04-10, 07:21 PM

why do they have to call us? we are living in US, and they are from outside of this country. why they want to calll oversea? and they just D-. I will not deposit to any sites which are rated not higher than D+ ..

**VTranX** · 05-05-10, 02:39 AM

WagerHub.com screwed up big-time. When you search "wagerhub.com" on google.com this thread will show up third down on the list.

**DBurton81** · 05-05-10, 05:06 PM

I know and rightfully so!

Originally posted by VTranX

WagerHub.com screwed up big-time. When you search "wagerhub.com" on google.com this thread will show up third down on the list.

**Hareeba!** · 05-05-10, 05:14 PM

My first read of this thread and I'm astonished that there's been not a single outcry about the $300 withdrawal fees!!

That alone is enough to tell you they are crooks

**relaaxx** · 05-05-10, 07:40 PM

Originally posted by sq764

Why does the "$300 in withdrawal fees' catch me more than anything

it has been mentioned. they are just thives. they were not happy with just screwing dburton out of $1900 in winnings.

**DBurton81** · 05-07-10, 05:54 PM

Where is my money GIA??

**relaaxx** · 05-09-10, 06:13 PM

i just love kicking this book, when they are down.

did not want the thread forgotten.

**DBurton81** · 05-10-10, 11:29 AM

LMAO

**DBurton81** · 05-10-10, 12:11 PM

CrazyLou....just wondering if you guys can hook me up with a small free play or something from a reputable book for what happened with WagerHub? I know that it was at no fault of SBR, but I know that you guys have some pull in this industry and can help players out sometimes when things like this happen.

**saints7011** · 05-10-10, 04:37 PM

Originally posted by DBurton81

CrazyLou....just wondering if you guys can hook me up with a small free play or something from a reputable book for what happened with WagerHub? I know that it was at no fault of SBR, but I know that you guys have some pull in this industry and can help players out sometimes when things like this happen.

I can't wait to here CrazyLou's response to this...don't you think you should've asked CrazyLou this question in a PM ?

**Dark Horse** · 05-10-10, 06:20 PM

Originally posted by saints7011

I can't wait to here CrazyLou's response to this...don't you think you should've asked CrazyLou this question in a PM ?

This is not a criticism, because it was very entertaining, but the fact is that I've never seen anybody laughed off the board as hard as CrazyL, when he used to post his tennis plays.

This world of gambling is similar to dogs. People sniff each other out in an instant. Communication here is based on a simple underlying premisis: "I know more than you, so I'm betting against you" or "You may know more than me, so I'm not betting against you." Dog eat dog. To somebody with credentials, like Dozer, a book will listen. The book knows that he knows at least as much as they do, and probably more. But if a lightweight like C. would be allowed to talk to books on behalf of SBR that would undermine the whole credibility of SBR.

This moderator let these Wagerhub ads through. And now he says he didn't see them, and tries to blame the error on posters. lol FWIW, he had that exact same mentality with his tennis picks. He didn't see this WH fiasco coming, while it was standing out like a sore thumb, but did he own up to it? The first rule of gambling: own your mistakes.

I don't expect C. to understand this. But I would love to hear SBR John's opinion on this WH story.

**FattyMcFatso** · 05-10-10, 07:40 PM

I'm still holding out hope SBR can find some way to get our money from Wagerhub...who STILL is in business.

Just want my $1,400 and I'm done. Why is that so difficult with them?

This is karma coming to bite me in the ass for opening up 3 accounts for that ****ING free play last year...serves me right

**DBurton81** · 05-10-10, 11:01 PM

Yes, you are right....asking him in a PM would have been a better option. Thanks.

Originally posted by saints7011

I can't wait to here CrazyLou's response to this...don't you think you should've asked CrazyLou this question in a PM ?

**saints7011** · 05-11-10, 12:13 AM

what does a mans tennis plays have to do with any of this ? you know , I suck at a few things in life , but that doesn't mean I can't do my job correctly...

**DBurton81** · 05-11-10, 12:31 PM

Originally posted by saints7011

what does a mans tennis plays have to do with any of this ? you know , I suck at a few things in life , but that doesn't mean I can't do my job correctly...

LOL....you have a good point here.

**saints7011** · 05-11-10, 01:08 PM

Originally posted by DBurton81

LOL....you have a good point here.

thanks DB , I wasn't trying to be a d*ck about you asking Lou in a PM , just thought it might have gotten you a better response that way , maybe even the response you were looking for , I had a good experience with wagerhub and hope everything works out for you , I personally dealt with Tom at all times and he was very good to me , unfortunately , with all the stuff being said in this thread I can't bring myself to giving them any of my money , I left there on the plus side so I should probably just mark them as a book that I beat...

**relaaxx** · 05-15-10, 01:09 PM

new thread 'WAGERHUB is a honest sportsbook' the only thing that is honest about them is thier open honest stupity. the stupidy being the reasons they used to keep dburton's $1900.