This is ridiculous.
I put a bet on Djokovic to win the Australian Open tournament long before the issues with his **** at the border.
There is actually a book in Pennsylvania, Unibet, that sent me an email arguing that the bet should stand citing some obsecure rule that even if a player pulls out prior to the tournament the bets should stand, they are arguing these bets are all action.
Djokavic didn't pull out either, he was kicked out of the country, so the obscure rule they are citing shouldn't apply anyways.
This wasn't a big bet, but on principle this is absurd, and I will not use this book again if this bet isn't refunded.
I put a bet on Djokovic to win the Australian Open tournament long before the issues with his **** at the border.
There is actually a book in Pennsylvania, Unibet, that sent me an email arguing that the bet should stand citing some obsecure rule that even if a player pulls out prior to the tournament the bets should stand, they are arguing these bets are all action.
Djokavic didn't pull out either, he was kicked out of the country, so the obscure rule they are citing shouldn't apply anyways.
This wasn't a big bet, but on principle this is absurd, and I will not use this book again if this bet isn't refunded.